Model comparison
Muse Glimmer vs Phi-4
Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 30.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Meta
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Muse Glimmer scores higher in 8 categories and Phi-4 in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Muse Glimmer leads 57.7 to 40.7.
Side by side
| Muse Glimmer | Phi-4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 41.3 | 30.9 |
| Released | — | 2024-12-11 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 128K |
| Max output | — | 4K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.07 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.14 |
| Results tracked | 13 | 37 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Muse Glimmer leads
Muse Glimmer: 38.7 (#157), Phi-4: 33.8 (#237)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1417 | 1231 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1355 | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 45.5% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 30.7% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 55.4% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Muse Glimmer: —, Phi-4: 22.6 (#120)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 28.8% |
| BALROG | — | 11.6% |
Reasoning Muse Glimmer leads
Muse Glimmer: 27.2 (#111), Phi-4: 17.0 (#287)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1395 | 1220 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 1% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 47.8% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 45.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 130.43 |
| LiveBench | — | 41.6% |
Math Muse Glimmer leads
Muse Glimmer: 36.1 (#128), Phi-4: 19.6 (#279)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1419 | 1246 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 13.8% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 42% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 64.9% |
Knowledge Muse Glimmer leads
Muse Glimmer: 37.9 (#140), Phi-4: 32.5 (#204)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1388 | 1203 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 56.1% |
| Confabulations | — | 29.4% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 3.7% |
| MMLU | — | 84.8% |
Multilingual Muse Glimmer leads
Muse Glimmer: 50.6 (#117), Phi-4: 37.4 (#232)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1384 | 1197 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1412 | 1211 |
| LMArena Russian | 1393 | 1209 |
| LMArena French | — | 1223 |
| LMArena German | — | 1222 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1158 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1151 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1234 |
Instruction Following Muse Glimmer leads
Muse Glimmer: 72.7 (#134), Phi-4: 60.6 (#246)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1374 | 1201 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 58.4% |
Long Context Muse Glimmer leads
Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#124), Phi-4: 36.9 (#221)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1381 | 1217 |
Writing & Preference Muse Glimmer leads
Muse Glimmer: 57.7 (#122), Phi-4: 40.7 (#239)
| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer | Phi-4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1389 | 1217 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1338 | 1182 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1398 | 1206 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 62.6% |
| LiveBench Language | — | 25.6% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Muse Glimmer better than Phi-4?
Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 30.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Muse Glimmer or Phi-4 better for coding?
Muse Glimmer scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.7 versus 33.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Muse Glimmer and Phi-4 share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Glimmer has 13 scored results on Noometry and Phi-4 has 37.