Model comparison
Mistral Small 3.2 vs Muse Glimmer
Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Mistral AI
MetaSummary
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Muse Glimmer leads 57.7 to 45.1.
Side by side
| Mistral Small 3.2 | Muse Glimmer | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 30.8 | 41.3 |
| Released | 2025-06-20 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 256K | — |
| Max output | 16K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.0938 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.25 | — |
| Results tracked | 6 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Mistral Small 3.2: —, Muse Glimmer: 38.7 (#157)
| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.2 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1355 |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1417 |
Reasoning Muse Glimmer leads
Mistral Small 3.2: 17.5 (#282), Muse Glimmer: 27.2 (#111)
| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.2 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 40.4% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1395 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 131.73 | — |
Math Muse Glimmer leads
Mistral Small 3.2: 24.9 (#251), Muse Glimmer: 36.1 (#128)
| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.2 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 30.3% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1419 |
Knowledge Muse Glimmer leads
Mistral Small 3.2: 26.8 (#249), Muse Glimmer: 37.9 (#140)
| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.2 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 49.1% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1388 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Mistral Small 3.2: —, Muse Glimmer: 50.6 (#117)
| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.2 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1384 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1412 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1393 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Mistral Small 3.2: —, Muse Glimmer: 72.7 (#134)
| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.2 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1374 |
Long Context Not comparable
Mistral Small 3.2: —, Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#124)
| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.2 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1381 |
Writing & Preference Muse Glimmer leads
Mistral Small 3.2: 45.1 (#219), Muse Glimmer: 57.7 (#122)
| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.2 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1389 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1338 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1255 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1398 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Mistral Small 3.2 better than Muse Glimmer?
Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Mistral Small 3.2 and Muse Glimmer share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Small 3.2 has 6 scored results on Noometry and Muse Glimmer has 13.