Model comparison
ERNIE 5.0 0110 vs Qwen Turbo
ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Baidu
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads 39.3 to 15.3.
Side by side
| ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen Turbo | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 41.8 | 27.1 |
| Released | — | 2024-11-01 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 16K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.05 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.20 |
| Results tracked | 20 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.0 (#94), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1455 | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 17.0 (#297), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 10.3% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 41.7% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1445 | — |
Math ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.3 (#110), Qwen Turbo: 15.3 (#297)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 6.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1437 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 56.2% |
Knowledge ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.8 (#128), Qwen Turbo: 22.2 (#272)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 41.8% |
| LMArena Expert | 1428 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.9 (#53), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1249 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 54.1 (#49), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1436 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1512 | — |
| LMArena French | 1467 | — |
| LMArena German | 1460 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1382 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1406 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1446 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1473 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 74.5 (#92), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1413 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.4 (#95), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1422 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 63.1 (#66), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1445 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1426 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1434 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 better than Qwen Turbo?
ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.0 0110 and Qwen Turbo share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.0 0110 has 20 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Turbo has 3.