Model comparison
ERNIE 5.0 0110 vs Qwen Max
ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 34.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Baidu
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher in 7 categories and Qwen Max in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads 39.3 to 22.3.
Side by side
| ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen Max | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 41.8 | 34.7 |
| Released | — | 2024-04-03 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 33K |
| Max output | — | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $1.60 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $6.40 |
| Results tracked | 20 | 23 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.0 (#94), Qwen Max: 30.7 (#292)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1455 | 1288 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 21.8% |
Reasoning Qwen Max leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 17.0 (#297), Qwen Max: 25.1 (#151)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1445 | 1269 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 10.3% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 41.7% | — |
Math ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.3 (#110), Qwen Max: 22.3 (#276)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1437 | 1275 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 16.1% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 67.2% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1% |
Knowledge ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.8 (#128), Qwen Max: 30.3 (#228)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1428 | 1248 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 56.1% |
Multimodal Not comparable
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.9 (#53), Qwen Max: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1249 | — |
Multilingual ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 54.1 (#49), Qwen Max: 41.8 (#202)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1436 | 1263 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1512 | 1254 |
| LMArena French | 1467 | 1330 |
| LMArena German | 1460 | 1254 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1382 | 1205 |
| LMArena Korean | 1406 | 1142 |
| LMArena Russian | 1446 | 1274 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1473 | 1290 |
Instruction Following ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 74.5 (#92), Qwen Max: 66.5 (#208)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1413 | 1262 |
Long Context ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.4 (#95), Qwen Max: 39.4 (#180)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1422 | 1288 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 66.7% |
Writing & Preference ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 63.1 (#66), Qwen Max: 47.8 (#205)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1445 | 1282 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1426 | 1248 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1434 | 1277 |
Frequently asked questions
Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 better than Qwen Max?
ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 34.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 or Qwen Max better for coding?
ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.0 versus 30.7 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.0 0110 and Qwen Max share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.0 0110 has 20 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Max has 23.