Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) vs Muse Glimmer
Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 35.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Google
MetaSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) scores higher in 1 category and Muse Glimmer in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Muse Glimmer leads 40.4 to 28.4.
- Muse Glimmer has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Muse Glimmer | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | |
| Noometry Index | 35.1 | 41.7 |
| Released | 2024-12-06 | 2026-08-10 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 54 | 15 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Muse Glimmer leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.4 (#315), Muse Glimmer: 40.4 (#142)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1350 | 1416 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 13.5% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 38.2% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1355 |
| SciCode | — | 44.9% |
| WeirdML | 25.8% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 45.9% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.4% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 59.9% | — |
| CadEval | 30% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.1 (#92), Muse Glimmer: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 11.4% | — |
Reasoning Muse Glimmer leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 15.2 (#318), Muse Glimmer: 25.7 (#144)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1346 | 1396 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 1.3% | — |
| SimpleBench | 31.1% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 37.8% | — |
| CritPt | — | 2.6% |
| EnigmaEval | 1.1% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 78.2% | — |
| DTBench | 63.2% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 69.4% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.36 | — |
| LiveBench | 66.9% | — |
Math Too close to call
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 37.9 (#146), Muse Glimmer: 38.8 (#125)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1352 | 1417 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 57.8% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 45.9% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 75.8% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 82.2% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 1.7% | — |
Knowledge Muse Glimmer leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 32.0 (#213), Muse Glimmer: 38.5 (#143)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1339 | 1386 |
| GPQA Diamond | 64.1% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 6.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 73.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 12.4% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 55.6% | — |
| MMLU | 79.7% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 36.5 (#79), Muse Glimmer: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1158 | — |
| GeoBench | 77% | — |
Multilingual Muse Glimmer leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 47.4 (#149), Muse Glimmer: 50.5 (#122)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1342 | 1384 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1373 | 1412 |
| LMArena Russian | 1351 | 1390 |
| LMArena French | 1391 | — |
| LMArena German | 1353 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1294 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1313 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1363 | — |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 74.4 (#97), Muse Glimmer: 72.6 (#135)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1336 | 1375 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 85.8% | — |
| IFEval | 84.1% | — |
Long Context Muse Glimmer leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 38.1 (#203), Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#129)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1344 | 1382 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 61.1% | — |
Writing & Preference Muse Glimmer leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 49.5 (#190), Muse Glimmer: 57.5 (#126)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1354 | 1389 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1340 | 1339 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1350 | 1399 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 73.8% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1128 | — |
| WildBench | 80% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 51.3% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) better than Muse Glimmer?
Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 35.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) or Muse Glimmer better for coding?
Muse Glimmer scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.4 versus 28.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) and Muse Glimmer share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) has 54 scored results on Noometry and Muse Glimmer has 15.