Model comparison
ERNIE 5.0 0110 vs Olmo 3 32b Think
ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.2 to 38.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.
Baidu
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher in 7 categories and Olmo 3 32b Think in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads 63.4 to 49.2.
- Olmo 3 32b Think has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Olmo 3 32b Think | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 41.2 | 38.1 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 20 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 42.3 (#94), Olmo 3 32b Think: 38.0 (#169)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1455 | 1318 |
Reasoning Olmo 3 32b Think leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 16.3 (#296), Olmo 3 32b Think: 24.9 (#138)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1446 | 1302 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 10.3% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 41.7% | — |
Math ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 36.5 (#111), Olmo 3 32b Think: 33.8 (#165)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1437 | 1315 |
Knowledge ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.2 (#125), Olmo 3 32b Think: 34.4 (#189)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1427 | 1272 |
Multimodal Not comparable
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.1 (#49), Olmo 3 32b Think: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1248 | — |
Multilingual ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 54.3 (#47), Olmo 3 32b Think: 41.4 (#205)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1436 | 1255 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1512 | 1300 |
| LMArena French | 1466 | 1291 |
| LMArena German | 1462 | 1290 |
| LMArena Russian | 1446 | 1255 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1383 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1406 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1473 | — |
Instruction Following ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 74.7 (#88), Olmo 3 32b Think: 67.4 (#193)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1413 | 1275 |
Long Context ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.4 (#90), Olmo 3 32b Think: 39.4 (#177)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1422 | 1296 |
Writing & Preference ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 63.4 (#64), Olmo 3 32b Think: 49.2 (#188)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1445 | 1300 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1426 | 1256 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1433 | 1289 |
Frequently asked questions
Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 better than Olmo 3 32b Think?
ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.2 to 38.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 or Olmo 3 32b Think better for coding?
ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.3 versus 38.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.0 0110 and Olmo 3 32b Think share?
14 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.0 0110 has 20 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3 32b Think has 14.