Model comparison

Muse Glimmer vs Nova 2.0 Pro Preview

Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

Muse Glimmer Meta

41.7

Rank #131 Confirmed

Nova 2.0 Pro Preview Amazon

33.4

Rank #244 Reported

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Muse Glimmer scores higher in 1 category and Nova 2.0 Pro Preview in 1 category; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Muse Glimmer leads 25.7 to 22.4.
  • Muse Glimmer has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Muse Glimmer and Nova 2.0 Pro Preview specifications
Muse GlimmerNova 2.0 Pro Preview
ProviderMetaAmazon
Noometry Index41.733.4
Released2026-08-102025-12-02
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked153

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

Muse Glimmer: 40.4 (#142), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 40.8 (#133)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse GlimmerNova 2.0 Pro Preview
SciCode44.9%42.7%
LMArena WebDev1355—
LMArena Coding1416—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Muse Glimmer: —, Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 21.9 (#136)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse GlimmerNova 2.0 Pro Preview
GDP.pdf—2%

Reasoning Muse Glimmer leads

Muse Glimmer: 25.7 (#144), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 22.4 (#194)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse GlimmerNova 2.0 Pro Preview
CritPt2.6%0%
LMArena Hard Prompts1396—

Math Not comparable

Muse Glimmer: 38.8 (#125), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse GlimmerNova 2.0 Pro Preview
LMArena Math1417—

Knowledge Not comparable

Muse Glimmer: 38.5 (#143), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse GlimmerNova 2.0 Pro Preview
LMArena Expert1386—

Multilingual Not comparable

Muse Glimmer: 50.5 (#122), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse GlimmerNova 2.0 Pro Preview
LMArena Non-English1384—
LMArena Chinese1412—
LMArena Russian1390—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Muse Glimmer: 72.6 (#135), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse GlimmerNova 2.0 Pro Preview
LMArena Instruction Following1375—

Long Context Not comparable

Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#129), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse GlimmerNova 2.0 Pro Preview
LMArena Longer Query1382—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Muse Glimmer: 57.5 (#126), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse GlimmerNova 2.0 Pro Preview
LMArena Text1389—
LMArena Creative Writing1339—
LMArena Multi-Turn1399—

Frequently asked questions

Is Muse Glimmer better than Nova 2.0 Pro Preview?

Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Muse Glimmer or Nova 2.0 Pro Preview better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (40.4 vs 40.8); test both on your own repository before choosing.

How many benchmarks do Muse Glimmer and Nova 2.0 Pro Preview share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Glimmer has 15 scored results on Noometry and Nova 2.0 Pro Preview has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper