Model comparison
ERNIE 5.0 0110 vs Nova 2.0 Pro Preview
ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
BaiduSummary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Nova 2.0 Pro Preview leads 22.4 to 17.0.
Side by side
| ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu | Amazon |
| Noometry Index | 41.8 | 33.4 |
| Released | — | 2025-12-02 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 20 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.0 (#94), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 40.8 (#133)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 42.7% |
| LMArena Coding | 1455 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
ERNIE 5.0 0110: —, Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 21.9 (#136)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| GDP.pdf | — | 2% |
Reasoning Nova 2.0 Pro Preview leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 17.0 (#297), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 22.4 (#194)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 10.3% | — |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| Thematic Generalization | 41.7% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1445 | — |
Math Not comparable
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.3 (#110), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1437 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.8 (#128), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1428 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.9 (#53), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1249 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 54.1 (#49), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1436 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1512 | — |
| LMArena French | 1467 | — |
| LMArena German | 1460 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1382 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1406 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1446 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1473 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 74.5 (#92), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1413 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.4 (#95), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1422 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 63.1 (#66), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1445 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1426 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1434 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 better than Nova 2.0 Pro Preview?
ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 or Nova 2.0 Pro Preview better for coding?
ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.0 versus 40.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.0 0110 and Nova 2.0 Pro Preview share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.0 0110 has 20 scored results on Noometry and Nova 2.0 Pro Preview has 3.