Model comparison

Mixtral 8x7B vs Qwen3-4B

Qwen3-4B is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.9 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Mixtral 8x7B Mistral AI

27.1

Rank #334 Confirmed

Qwen3-4B Alibaba (Qwen)

31.9

Rank #264 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Mixtral 8x7B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3-4B in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3-4B leads 33.0 to 11.0.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 30.6% for Mixtral 8x7B and 52.3% for Qwen3-4B.

Side by side

Mixtral 8x7B and Qwen3-4B specifications
Mixtral 8x7BQwen3-4B
ProviderMistral AIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index27.131.9
Released2023-12-112025-04-29
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window32K—
Max output32K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.70—
Output $ / M tokens$0.70—
Results tracked386

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Mixtral 8x7B: 32.8 (#269), Qwen3-4B: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMixtral 8x7BQwen3-4B
LMArena Coding1126—
HumanEval+39.6%—
MBPP+49.7%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Mixtral 8x7B: —, Qwen3-4B: 27.6 (#100)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMixtral 8x7BQwen3-4B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—35.7%

Reasoning Qwen3-4B leads

Mixtral 8x7B: 18.2 (#285), Qwen3-4B: 19.2 (#268)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMixtral 8x7BQwen3-4B
Chess Puzzles—4%
LMArena Hard Prompts1115—
DTBench49.6%—
Adversarial NLI55.2%—
Epoch Capabilities Index118.47—
ForecastBench56.3—
HellaSwag86.7%—
PIQA83.6%—
WinoGrande77.2%—

Math Qwen3-4B leads

Mixtral 8x7B: 18.8 (#289), Qwen3-4B: 29.7 (#240)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMixtral 8x7BQwen3-4B
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—38.5%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—52.2%
Omni-MATH10.5%—
LMArena Math1147—
MATH Level 510%—
GSM8K74.4%—

Knowledge Qwen3-4B leads

Mixtral 8x7B: 11.0 (#301), Qwen3-4B: 33.0 (#208)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMixtral 8x7BQwen3-4B
GPQA Diamond30.6%52.3%
MMLU-Pro33.5%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate—5.7%
GPQA (HELM)29.6%—
LMArena Expert1088—
ARC (AI2) Challenge87.3%—
MMLU70.6%—
OpenBookQA85.8%—
TriviaQA82.2%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Mixtral 8x7B: 29.6 (#266), Qwen3-4B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMixtral 8x7BQwen3-4B
LMArena Non-English1077—
LMArena Chinese1055—
LMArena French1166—
LMArena German1114—
LMArena Japanese931—
LMArena Korean968—
LMArena Russian1090—
LMArena Spanish1111—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Mixtral 8x7B: 51.0 (#297), Qwen3-4B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMixtral 8x7BQwen3-4B
IFEval57.5%—
LMArena Instruction Following1109—

Long Context Not comparable

Mixtral 8x7B: 33.4 (#260), Qwen3-4B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMixtral 8x7BQwen3-4B
LMArena Longer Query1103—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Mixtral 8x7B: 34.2 (#270), Qwen3-4B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMixtral 8x7BQwen3-4B
LMArena Text1132—
LMArena Creative Writing1109—
WildBench67.3%—
LMArena Multi-Turn1115—

Frequently asked questions

Is Mixtral 8x7B better than Qwen3-4B?

Qwen3-4B is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.9 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Mixtral 8x7B and Qwen3-4B share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Mixtral 8x7B has 38 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-4B has 6.

Related comparisons

Go deeper