Model comparison

Mixtral 8x22B vs Qwen3-4B

Qwen3-4B is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.9 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Mixtral 8x22B Mistral AI

27.1

Rank #333 Confirmed

Qwen3-4B Alibaba (Qwen)

31.9

Rank #264 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Mixtral 8x22B scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3-4B in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3-4B leads 33.0 to 15.1.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 34.1% for Mixtral 8x22B and 52.3% for Qwen3-4B.

Side by side

Mixtral 8x22B and Qwen3-4B specifications
Mixtral 8x22BQwen3-4B
ProviderMistral AIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index27.131.9
Released2024-04-172025-04-29
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window64K—
Max output64K—
Input $ / M tokens$2—
Output $ / M tokens$6—
Results tracked346

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Mixtral 8x22B: 24.2 (#329), Qwen3-4B: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMixtral 8x22BQwen3-4B
WeirdML3.2%—
BigCodeBench Instruct40.6%—
LMArena Coding1166—
BigCodeBench Complete50.2%—
HumanEval+72%—
MBPP+64.3%—

Agentic & Tool Use Qwen3-4B leads

Mixtral 8x22B: 23.1 (#127), Qwen3-4B: 27.6 (#100)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMixtral 8x22BQwen3-4B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—35.7%
Cybench7.5%—

Reasoning Too close to call

Mixtral 8x22B: 19.9 (#248), Qwen3-4B: 19.2 (#268)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMixtral 8x22BQwen3-4B
Chess Puzzles—4%
LMArena Hard Prompts1150—
DTBench55.1%—
Epoch Capabilities Index122.03—
ForecastBench56.3—

Math Qwen3-4B leads

Mixtral 8x22B: 22.9 (#275), Qwen3-4B: 29.7 (#240)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMixtral 8x22BQwen3-4B
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—38.5%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—52.2%
Omni-MATH16.3%—
LMArena Math1184—
MATH Level 524.2%—

Knowledge Qwen3-4B leads

Mixtral 8x22B: 15.1 (#293), Qwen3-4B: 33.0 (#208)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMixtral 8x22BQwen3-4B
GPQA Diamond34.1%52.3%
MMLU-Pro46%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate—5.7%
GPQA (HELM)33.4%—
LMArena Expert1113—
MMLU77.8%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Mixtral 8x22B: 32.8 (#255), Qwen3-4B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMixtral 8x22BQwen3-4B
LMArena Non-English1128—
LMArena Chinese1116—
LMArena French1166—
LMArena German1141—
LMArena Japanese1037—
LMArena Korean1057—
LMArena Russian1158—
LMArena Spanish1151—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Mixtral 8x22B: 57.7 (#266), Qwen3-4B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMixtral 8x22BQwen3-4B
IFEval72.4%—
LMArena Instruction Following1147—

Long Context Not comparable

Mixtral 8x22B: 34.7 (#247), Qwen3-4B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMixtral 8x22BQwen3-4B
LMArena Longer Query1144—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Mixtral 8x22B: 36.9 (#262), Qwen3-4B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMixtral 8x22BQwen3-4B
LMArena Text1162—
LMArena Creative Writing1141—
WildBench71.1%—
LMArena Multi-Turn1130—

Frequently asked questions

Is Mixtral 8x22B better than Qwen3-4B?

Qwen3-4B is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.9 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Mixtral 8x22B and Qwen3-4B share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Mixtral 8x22B has 34 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-4B has 6.

Related comparisons

Go deeper