Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Qwen3-4B

Qwen3-4B is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.9 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 1.0 Pro Google

27.3

Rank #332 Confirmed

Qwen3-4B Alibaba (Qwen)

31.9

Rank #264 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3-4B in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3-4B leads 29.7 to 9.3.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 1.1% for Gemini 1.0 Pro and 52.2% for Qwen3-4B.
  • Qwen3-4B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 1.0 ProQwen3-4B
ProviderGoogleAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index27.331.9
Released2023-12-132025-04-29
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked246

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 32.2 (#275), Qwen3-4B: —

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProQwen3-4B
LMArena Coding1108—
HumanEval+55.5%—
MBPP+61.4%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 1.0 Pro: —, Qwen3-4B: 27.6 (#100)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProQwen3-4B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—35.7%

Reasoning Qwen3-4B leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 17.1 (#296), Qwen3-4B: 19.2 (#268)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProQwen3-4B
Chess Puzzles—4%
LMArena Hard Prompts1109—
DTBench45.9%—
Epoch Capabilities Index117.04—

Math Qwen3-4B leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 9.3 (#321), Qwen3-4B: 29.7 (#240)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProQwen3-4B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20251.1%52.2%
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—38.5%
LMArena Math1132—
MATH Level 511.2%—

Knowledge Qwen3-4B leads

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.6 (#291), Qwen3-4B: 33.0 (#208)

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProQwen3-4B
GPQA Diamond34%52.3%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—5.7%
LMArena Expert1059—
MMLU70%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.4 (#252), Qwen3-4B: —

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProQwen3-4B
LMArena Non-English1138—
LMArena Chinese1124—
LMArena French1145—
LMArena German1125—
LMArena Japanese1023—
LMArena Russian1186—
LMArena Spanish1119—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.6 (#267), Qwen3-4B: —

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProQwen3-4B
LMArena Instruction Following1114—

Long Context Not comparable

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#249), Qwen3-4B: —

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProQwen3-4B
LMArena Longer Query1132—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.0 (#264), Qwen3-4B: —

BenchmarkGemini 1.0 ProQwen3-4B
LMArena Text1149—
LMArena Creative Writing1131—
LMArena Multi-Turn1139—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than Qwen3-4B?

Qwen3-4B is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.9 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and Qwen3-4B share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-4B has 6.

Related comparisons

Go deeper