Noometry

Model comparison

Mixtral 8x7B vs Nova 2 Lite

Nova 2 Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.7 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Mixtral 8x7B Mistral AI

27.1

Rank #334 Confirmed

Nova 2 Lite Amazon

39.7

Rank #161 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Mixtral 8x7B scores higher in 0 categories and Nova 2 Lite in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Nova 2 Lite leads 43.0 to 11.0.
  • Mixtral 8x7B is cheaper at $0.70 / $0.70 per million input/output tokens, against $0.30 / $2.50 for Nova 2 Lite.
  • Nova 2 Lite accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 32K.
  • Mixtral 8x7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Mixtral 8x7BNova 2 Lite
ProviderMistral AIAmazon
Noometry Index27.139.7
Released2023-12-112025-12-01
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window32K1M
Max output32K64K
Input $ / M tokens$0.70$0.30
Output $ / M tokens$0.70$2.50
Results tracked3819

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Nova 2 Lite leads

Mixtral 8x7B: 32.8 (#269), Nova 2 Lite: 40.7 (#134)

BenchmarkMixtral 8x7BNova 2 Lite
LMArena Coding11261385
HumanEval+39.6%—
MBPP+49.7%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Mixtral 8x7B: —, Nova 2 Lite: 24.1 (#121)

BenchmarkMixtral 8x7BNova 2 Lite
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—27.1%

Reasoning Nova 2 Lite leads

Mixtral 8x7B: 18.2 (#285), Nova 2 Lite: 27.5 (#118)

BenchmarkMixtral 8x7BNova 2 Lite
LMArena Hard Prompts11151364
DTBench49.6%—
Adversarial NLI55.2%—
Epoch Capabilities Index118.47—
ForecastBench56.3—
HellaSwag86.7%—
PIQA83.6%—
WinoGrande77.2%—

Math Nova 2 Lite leads

Mixtral 8x7B: 18.8 (#289), Nova 2 Lite: 37.5 (#156)

BenchmarkMixtral 8x7BNova 2 Lite
LMArena Math11471359
Omni-MATH10.5%—
MATH Level 510%—
GSM8K74.4%—

Knowledge Nova 2 Lite leads

Mixtral 8x7B: 11.0 (#301), Nova 2 Lite: 43.0 (#94)

BenchmarkMixtral 8x7BNova 2 Lite
LMArena Expert10881358
GPQA Diamond30.6%—
MMLU-Pro33.5%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate—5.1%
GPQA (HELM)29.6%—
ARC (AI2) Challenge87.3%—
MMLU70.6%—
OpenBookQA85.8%—
TriviaQA82.2%—

Multilingual Nova 2 Lite leads

Mixtral 8x7B: 29.6 (#266), Nova 2 Lite: 47.1 (#153)

BenchmarkMixtral 8x7BNova 2 Lite
LMArena Non-English10771337
LMArena Chinese10551364
LMArena French11661381
LMArena German11141343
LMArena Japanese9311271
LMArena Korean9681284
LMArena Russian10901343
LMArena Spanish11111373

Instruction Following Nova 2 Lite leads

Mixtral 8x7B: 51.0 (#297), Nova 2 Lite: 70.5 (#161)

BenchmarkMixtral 8x7BNova 2 Lite
LMArena Instruction Following11091335
IFEval57.5%—

Long Context Nova 2 Lite leads

Mixtral 8x7B: 33.4 (#260), Nova 2 Lite: 40.6 (#150)

BenchmarkMixtral 8x7BNova 2 Lite
LMArena Longer Query11031335

Writing & Preference Nova 2 Lite leads

Mixtral 8x7B: 34.2 (#270), Nova 2 Lite: 53.9 (#154)

BenchmarkMixtral 8x7BNova 2 Lite
LMArena Text11321362
LMArena Creative Writing11091291
LMArena Multi-Turn11151338
WildBench67.3%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Mixtral 8x7B better than Nova 2 Lite?

Nova 2 Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.7 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Mixtral 8x7B or Nova 2 Lite?

Mixtral 8x7B is cheaper. It lists at $0.70 per million input tokens and $0.70 per million output tokens; Nova 2 Lite lists at $0.30 and $2.50.

Is Mixtral 8x7B or Nova 2 Lite better for coding?

Nova 2 Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.7 versus 32.8 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Nova 2 Lite does, with 1M tokens against 32K.

How many benchmarks do Mixtral 8x7B and Nova 2 Lite share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mixtral 8x7B has 38 scored results on Noometry and Nova 2 Lite has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper