Model comparison

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale vs Mixtral 8x7B

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.7 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale DeepSeek

39.7

Rank #162 Reported

Mixtral 8x7B Mistral AI

27.1

Rank #334 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale leads 32.9 to 18.2.
  • Mixtral 8x7B is cheaper at $0.70 / $0.70 per million input/output tokens, against $0.58 / $1.68 for DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale.
  • DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale accepts more context: 128K tokens versus 32K.

Side by side

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale and Mixtral 8x7B specifications
DeepSeek-V3.2-SpecialeMixtral 8x7B
ProviderDeepSeekMistral AI
Noometry Index39.727.1
Released2025-12-012023-12-11
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window128K32K
Max output128K32K
Input $ / M tokens$0.58$0.70
Output $ / M tokens$1.68$0.70
Results tracked338

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale leads

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: 40.4 (#140), Mixtral 8x7B: 32.8 (#269)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-SpecialeMixtral 8x7B
WeirdML46.7%—
LMArena Coding—1126
HumanEval+—39.6%
MBPP+—49.7%

Reasoning DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale leads

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: 32.9 (#73), Mixtral 8x7B: 18.2 (#285)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-SpecialeMixtral 8x7B
SimpleBench52.6%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1115
DTBench—49.6%
Adversarial NLI—55.2%
Epoch Capabilities Index—118.47
ForecastBench—56.3
HellaSwag—86.7%
PIQA—83.6%
WinoGrande—77.2%

Math Not comparable

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, Mixtral 8x7B: 18.8 (#289)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-SpecialeMixtral 8x7B
Omni-MATH—10.5%
LMArena Math—1147
MATH Level 5—10%
GSM8K—74.4%

Knowledge Not comparable

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, Mixtral 8x7B: 11.0 (#301)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-SpecialeMixtral 8x7B
GPQA Diamond—30.6%
MMLU-Pro—33.5%
GPQA (HELM)—29.6%
LMArena Expert—1088
ARC (AI2) Challenge—87.3%
MMLU—70.6%
OpenBookQA—85.8%
TriviaQA—82.2%

Multilingual Not comparable

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, Mixtral 8x7B: 29.6 (#266)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-SpecialeMixtral 8x7B
LMArena Non-English—1077
LMArena Chinese—1055
LMArena French—1166
LMArena German—1114
LMArena Japanese—931
LMArena Korean—968
LMArena Russian—1090
LMArena Spanish—1111

Instruction Following Not comparable

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, Mixtral 8x7B: 51.0 (#297)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-SpecialeMixtral 8x7B
IFEval—57.5%
LMArena Instruction Following—1109

Long Context Not comparable

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, Mixtral 8x7B: 33.4 (#260)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-SpecialeMixtral 8x7B
LMArena Longer Query—1103

Writing & Preference DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale leads

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: 46.0 (#222), Mixtral 8x7B: 34.2 (#270)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3.2-SpecialeMixtral 8x7B
LMArena Text—1132
LMArena Creative Writing—1109
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1276—
WildBench—67.3%
LMArena Multi-Turn—1115

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale better than Mixtral 8x7B?

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.7 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale or Mixtral 8x7B?

Mixtral 8x7B is cheaper. It lists at $0.70 per million input tokens and $0.70 per million output tokens; DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale lists at $0.58 and $1.68.

Is DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale or Mixtral 8x7B better for coding?

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.4 versus 32.8 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale does, with 128K tokens against 32K.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale and Mixtral 8x7B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale has 3 scored results on Noometry and Mixtral 8x7B has 38.

Related comparisons

Go deeper