Model comparison

Mixtral 8x7B vs QwQ-32B

QwQ-32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.8 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 20 shared benchmarks.

Mixtral 8x7B Mistral AI

27.1

Rank #334 Confirmed

QwQ-32B Alibaba (Qwen)

39.8

Rank #159 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. Mixtral 8x7B scores higher in 0 categories and QwQ-32B in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where QwQ-32B leads 37.2 to 11.0.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 30.6% for Mixtral 8x7B and 65.3% for QwQ-32B.

Side by side

Mixtral 8x7B and QwQ-32B specifications
Mixtral 8x7BQwQ-32B
ProviderMistral AIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index27.139.8
Released2023-12-112024-11-28
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window32K—
Max output32K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.70—
Output $ / M tokens$0.70—
Results tracked3836

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding QwQ-32B leads

Mixtral 8x7B: 32.8 (#269), QwQ-32B: 35.4 (#226)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMixtral 8x7BQwQ-32B
LMArena Coding11261333
Aider Polyglot—20.9%
BigCodeBench Instruct—44.6%
LiveBench Coding—72.2%
BigCodeBench Complete—54.4%
HumanEval+39.6%—
MBPP+49.7%—

Reasoning QwQ-32B leads

Mixtral 8x7B: 18.2 (#285), QwQ-32B: 23.7 (#174)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMixtral 8x7BQwQ-32B
LMArena Hard Prompts11151325
Epoch Capabilities Index118.47137.6
ForecastBench56.358.3
Chess Puzzles—5%
LiveBench Reasoning—83.5%
DTBench49.6%—
LiveBench Data Analysis—65%
Adversarial NLI55.2%—
HellaSwag86.7%—
LiveBench—72%
PIQA83.6%—
WinoGrande77.2%—

Math QwQ-32B leads

Mixtral 8x7B: 18.8 (#289), QwQ-32B: 38.0 (#143)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMixtral 8x7BQwQ-32B
LMArena Math11471359
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—59.2%
Omni-MATH10.5%—
LiveBench Math—77.8%
MATH Level 510%—
GSM8K74.4%—

Knowledge QwQ-32B leads

Mixtral 8x7B: 11.0 (#301), QwQ-32B: 37.2 (#158)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMixtral 8x7BQwQ-32B
GPQA Diamond30.6%65.3%
LMArena Expert10881324
MMLU-Pro33.5%—
Confabulations—15.6%
GPQA (HELM)29.6%—
ARC (AI2) Challenge87.3%—
MMLU70.6%—
OpenBookQA85.8%—
TriviaQA82.2%—

Multilingual QwQ-32B leads

Mixtral 8x7B: 29.6 (#266), QwQ-32B: 44.8 (#176)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMixtral 8x7BQwQ-32B
LMArena Non-English10771305
LMArena Chinese10551378
LMArena French11661336
LMArena German11141313
LMArena Japanese9311262
LMArena Korean9681279
LMArena Russian10901297
LMArena Spanish11111354

Instruction Following QwQ-32B leads

Mixtral 8x7B: 51.0 (#297), QwQ-32B: 72.6 (#137)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMixtral 8x7BQwQ-32B
LMArena Instruction Following11091297
LiveBench Instruction Following—81.8%
IFEval57.5%—

Long Context QwQ-32B leads

Mixtral 8x7B: 33.4 (#260), QwQ-32B: 49.0 (#11)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMixtral 8x7BQwQ-32B
LMArena Longer Query11031308
Fiction.LiveBench—83.3%

Writing & Preference QwQ-32B leads

Mixtral 8x7B: 34.2 (#270), QwQ-32B: 50.6 (#180)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMixtral 8x7BQwQ-32B
LMArena Text11321329
LMArena Creative Writing11091288
LMArena Multi-Turn11151314
Short-Story Creative Writing—80.2%
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1257
WildBench67.3%—
LiveBench Language—51.4%

Frequently asked questions

Is Mixtral 8x7B better than QwQ-32B?

QwQ-32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.8 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is Mixtral 8x7B or QwQ-32B better for coding?

QwQ-32B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.4 versus 32.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Mixtral 8x7B and QwQ-32B share?

20 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mixtral 8x7B has 38 scored results on Noometry and QwQ-32B has 36.

Related comparisons

Go deeper