Model comparison

Mistral vs Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct

Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Mistral Mistral AI

29.9

Rank #303 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Mistral scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads 37.0 to 16.6.
  • Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Mistral and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct specifications
MistralQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
ProviderMistral AIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index29.938.1
Released—2025-04
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.50
Output $ / M tokens—$7.50
Results tracked2225

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads

Mistral: 33.8 (#250), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 35.5 (#223)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMistralQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Coding11621412
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—55.4%
LMArena WebDev—1275
GSO—4.9%
WeirdML—41.2%
ALE-Bench—461.45
AlgoTune—1.44

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Mistral: —, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 23.9 (#123)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMistralQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
Terminal-Bench—27.2%

Reasoning Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads

Mistral: 22.2 (#200), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 25.5 (#149)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMistralQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts11491372
Kagi LLM Benchmark—49.5%

Math Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads

Mistral: 22.3 (#278), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 37.6 (#150)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMistralQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Math11801365
Omni-MATH7.2%—

Knowledge Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads

Mistral: 16.6 (#288), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 37.0 (#162)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMistralQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Expert11251338
MMLU-Pro27.7%—
GPQA (HELM)30.3%—

Multilingual Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads

Mistral: 32.8 (#254), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 47.7 (#148)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMistralQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Non-English11291346
LMArena Chinese11091357
LMArena French11801398
LMArena German11551325
LMArena Japanese10131310
LMArena Korean10321305
LMArena Russian11681366
LMArena Spanish11431360

Instruction Following Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads

Mistral: 52.6 (#288), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 71.6 (#147)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMistralQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following11521355
IFEval56.8%—

Long Context Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads

Mistral: 35.0 (#245), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 42.0 (#131)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMistralQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Longer Query11531378

Writing & Preference Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads

Mistral: 37.0 (#260), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 55.3 (#147)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMistralQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Text11651357
LMArena Creative Writing11581333
LMArena Multi-Turn11471365
WildBench66%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Mistral better than Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct?

Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Mistral or Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct better for coding?

Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.5 versus 33.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Mistral and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral has 22 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct has 25.

Related comparisons

Go deeper