Model comparison
OLMo 2 Furious 13B vs Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 29.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads 36.4 to 18.0.
Side by side
| OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 29.2 | 37.7 |
| Released | 2024-12-31 | 2025-04 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $1.50 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $7.50 |
| Results tracked | 12 | 25 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.1 (#309), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 36.2 (#199)
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 55.4% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1275 |
| GSO | — | 4.9% |
| WeirdML | — | 41.2% |
| LiveBench Coding | 10.4% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1413 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 461.45 |
| AlgoTune | — | 1.44 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 23.7 (#116)
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 27.2% |
Reasoning Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 14.8 (#312), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 24.7 (#141)
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 49.5% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 16.3% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1372 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 20.6% | — |
| LiveBench | 22.1% | — |
Math Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 21.3 (#270), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 34.9 (#151)
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | 15.6% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 13.6% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1364 |
Knowledge Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.0 (#278), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 36.4 (#159)
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 31% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 31.6% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1337 |
Multilingual Not comparable
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 47.8 (#143)
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1345 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1356 |
| LMArena French | — | 1394 |
| LMArena German | — | 1324 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1309 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1307 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1367 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1360 |
Instruction Following Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 61.1 (#243), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 71.8 (#142)
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 60.6% | — |
| IFEval | 73% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1356 |
Long Context Not comparable
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 42.0 (#126)
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1379 |
Writing & Preference Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 43.0 (#226), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 55.5 (#142)
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1356 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1333 |
| WildBench | 68.9% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1365 |
| LiveBench Language | 11.2% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is OLMo 2 Furious 13B better than Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct?
Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 29.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is OLMo 2 Furious 13B or Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct better for coding?
Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.2 versus 28.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do OLMo 2 Furious 13B and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct has 25.