Model comparison

MiniMax-M2.5 vs Mistral

MiniMax-M2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.3 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

MiniMax-M2.5 MiniMax

38.3

Rank #188 Confirmed

Mistral Mistral AI

29.9

Rank #303 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. MiniMax-M2.5 scores higher in 7 categories and Mistral in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where MiniMax-M2.5 leads 39.2 to 16.6.
  • MiniMax-M2.5 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

MiniMax-M2.5 and Mistral specifications
MiniMax-M2.5Mistral
ProviderMiniMaxMistral AI
Noometry Index38.329.9
Released2026-02-12—
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window205K—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.30—
Output $ / M tokens$1.20—
Results tracked3322

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiniMax-M2.5 leads

MiniMax-M2.5: 48.1 (#58), Mistral: 33.8 (#250)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.5Mistral
LMArena Coding13811162
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)75.8%—
LMArena WebDev1387—
SWE-bench Multilingual68.3%—
ALE-Bench618.17—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

MiniMax-M2.5: 30.4 (#77), Mistral: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.5Mistral
Terminal-Bench42.7%—
Vending-Bench 2-23.16—

Reasoning Mistral leads

MiniMax-M2.5: 17.5 (#292), Mistral: 22.2 (#200)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.5Mistral
LMArena Hard Prompts13721149
ARC-AGI-24.9%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark55.2%—
NYT Connections (extended)16.8%—
ARC-AGI-163.7%—
Epoch Capabilities Index146.68—

Math MiniMax-M2.5 leads

MiniMax-M2.5: 26.9 (#253), Mistral: 22.3 (#278)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.5Mistral
LMArena Math13781180
ProofBench4%—
Omni-MATH—7.2%

Knowledge MiniMax-M2.5 leads

MiniMax-M2.5: 39.2 (#135), Mistral: 16.6 (#288)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.5Mistral
LMArena Expert13791125
MMLU-Pro—27.7%
Vectara Hallucination Rate9.1%—
GPQA (HELM)—30.3%

Multilingual MiniMax-M2.5 leads

MiniMax-M2.5: 47.1 (#152), Mistral: 32.8 (#254)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.5Mistral
LMArena Non-English13381129
LMArena Chinese13931109
LMArena French13621180
LMArena German13621155
LMArena Japanese11711013
LMArena Korean12321032
LMArena Russian13581168
LMArena Spanish13541143

Instruction Following MiniMax-M2.5 leads

MiniMax-M2.5: 71.5 (#148), Mistral: 52.6 (#288)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.5Mistral
LMArena Instruction Following13531152
IFEval—56.8%

Long Context MiniMax-M2.5 leads

MiniMax-M2.5: 37.5 (#216), Mistral: 35.0 (#245)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.5Mistral
LMArena Longer Query13661153
CL-bench11.4%—
CL-bench Life6.3%—

Writing & Preference MiniMax-M2.5 leads

MiniMax-M2.5: 53.9 (#153), Mistral: 37.0 (#260)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.5Mistral
LMArena Text13591165
LMArena Creative Writing13311158
LMArena Multi-Turn13641147
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1361—
WildBench—66%

Frequently asked questions

Is MiniMax-M2.5 better than Mistral?

MiniMax-M2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.3 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is MiniMax-M2.5 or Mistral better for coding?

MiniMax-M2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 48.1 versus 33.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do MiniMax-M2.5 and Mistral share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiniMax-M2.5 has 33 scored results on Noometry and Mistral has 22.

Related comparisons

Go deeper