Model comparison

Mistral Small 3 vs Sonar

Sonar is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.8 to 30.9 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Small 3 costs 17× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Sonar's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Mistral Small 3 Mistral AI

30.9

Rank #268 Confirmed

Sonar Perplexity

37.8

Rank #184 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Sonar leads 52.6 to 32.4.
  • Mistral Small 3 is cheaper at $0.05 / $0.08 per million input/output tokens, against $1 / $1 for Sonar.
  • Sonar accepts more context: 128K tokens versus 33K.
  • Mistral Small 3 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Mistral Small 3 and Sonar specifications
Mistral Small 3Sonar
ProviderMistral AIPerplexity
Noometry Index30.937.8
Released2025-01-302024-01-01
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window33K128K
Max output16K4K
Input $ / M tokens$0.05$1
Output $ / M tokens$0.08$1
Results tracked247

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

Mistral Small 3: 36.0 (#203), Sonar: 35.1 (#217)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3Sonar
BigCodeBench Instruct45.3%—
LiveBench Coding—35.1%
LMArena Coding1246—
BigCodeBench Complete50.4%—

Reasoning Sonar leads

Mistral Small 3: 18.2 (#269), Sonar: 20.3 (#221)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3Sonar
Chess Puzzles0%—
LiveBench Reasoning—46.3%
LMArena Hard Prompts1233—
LiveBench Data Analysis—37.9%
Epoch Capabilities Index127.06—
LiveBench—46.9%

Math Sonar leads

Mistral Small 3: 15.3 (#290), Sonar: 31.3 (#197)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3Sonar
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20256.7%—
LiveBench Math—41.6%
LMArena Math1240—

Knowledge Not comparable

Mistral Small 3: 25.0 (#258), Sonar: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3Sonar
GPQA Diamond47.3%—
Confabulations25.2%—
LMArena Expert1202—

Multilingual Not comparable

Mistral Small 3: 37.5 (#231), Sonar: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3Sonar
LMArena Non-English1198—
LMArena Chinese1204—
LMArena French1202—
LMArena German1211—
LMArena Japanese1111—
LMArena Korean1188—
LMArena Russian1216—

Instruction Following Sonar leads

Mistral Small 3: 63.9 (#224), Sonar: 71.5 (#146)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3Sonar
LiveBench Instruction Following—76.2%
LMArena Instruction Following1214—

Long Context Not comparable

Mistral Small 3: 37.8 (#206), Sonar: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3Sonar
LMArena Longer Query1246—

Writing & Preference Sonar leads

Mistral Small 3: 32.4 (#275), Sonar: 52.6 (#166)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3Sonar
LMArena Text1234—
LMArena Creative Writing1195—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing707—
LMArena Multi-Turn1217—
LiveBench Language—44.1%

Frequently asked questions

Is Mistral Small 3 better than Sonar?

Sonar is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.8 to 30.9 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Small 3 costs 17× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Sonar's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Mistral Small 3 or Sonar?

Mistral Small 3 is cheaper. It lists at $0.05 per million input tokens and $0.08 per million output tokens; Sonar lists at $1 and $1.

Is Mistral Small 3 or Sonar better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (36.0 vs 35.1); test both on your own repository before choosing.

Which has the bigger context window?

Sonar does, with 128K tokens against 33K.

How many benchmarks do Mistral Small 3 and Sonar share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Small 3 has 24 scored results on Noometry and Sonar has 7.

Related comparisons

Go deeper