Model comparison

Phi-4 vs Sonar

Sonar is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.5 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index. Phi-4 costs 11× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Sonar's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 7 shared benchmarks.

Phi-4 Microsoft

31.2

Rank #279 Confirmed

Sonar Perplexity

38.5

Rank #187 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 7 benchmarks with published results for both. Phi-4 scores higher in 0 categories and Sonar in 5 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Sonar leads 33.7 to 20.8.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is LiveBench Language: 25.6% for Phi-4 and 44.1% for Sonar.
  • Phi-4 is cheaper at $0.07 / $0.14 per million input/output tokens, against $1 / $1 for Sonar.
  • Phi-4 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Phi-4 and Sonar specifications
Phi-4Sonar
ProviderMicrosoftPerplexity
Noometry Index31.238.5
Released2024-12-112024-01-01
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window128K128K
Max output4K4K
Input $ / M tokens$0.07$1
Output $ / M tokens$0.14$1
Results tracked377

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Sonar leads

Phi-4: 34.4 (#239), Sonar: 35.7 (#221)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi-4Sonar
LiveBench Coding30.7%35.1%
BigCodeBench Instruct45.5%—
LMArena Coding1231—
BigCodeBench Complete55.4%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Phi-4: 22.8 (#128), Sonar: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi-4Sonar
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard28.8%—
BALROG11.6%—

Reasoning Sonar leads

Phi-4: 17.7 (#291), Sonar: 21.1 (#227)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi-4Sonar
LiveBench Reasoning47.8%46.3%
LiveBench Data Analysis45.2%37.9%
LiveBench41.6%46.9%
Chess Puzzles1%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1220—
Epoch Capabilities Index130.42—

Math Sonar leads

Phi-4: 20.8 (#285), Sonar: 33.7 (#200)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi-4Sonar
LiveBench Math42%41.6%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202513.8%—
LMArena Math1246—
MATH Level 564.9%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Phi-4: 32.6 (#209), Sonar: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi-4Sonar
GPQA Diamond56.1%—
Confabulations29.4%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate3.7%—
LMArena Expert1203—
MMLU84.8%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Phi-4: 37.2 (#237), Sonar: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi-4Sonar
LMArena Non-English1197—
LMArena Chinese1212—
LMArena French1224—
LMArena German1222—
LMArena Japanese1158—
LMArena Korean1151—
LMArena Russian1209—
LMArena Spanish1234—

Instruction Following Sonar leads

Phi-4: 60.4 (#251), Sonar: 71.4 (#150)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi-4Sonar
LiveBench Instruction Following58.4%76.2%
LMArena Instruction Following1201—

Long Context Not comparable

Phi-4: 36.9 (#226), Sonar: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi-4Sonar
LMArena Longer Query1217—

Writing & Preference Sonar leads

Phi-4: 40.5 (#244), Sonar: 52.6 (#167)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi-4Sonar
LiveBench Language25.6%44.1%
LMArena Text1217—
LMArena Creative Writing1182—
Short-Story Creative Writing62.6%—
LMArena Multi-Turn1206—

Frequently asked questions

Is Phi-4 better than Sonar?

Sonar is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.5 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index. Phi-4 costs 11× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Sonar's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Phi-4 or Sonar?

Phi-4 is cheaper. It lists at $0.07 per million input tokens and $0.14 per million output tokens; Sonar lists at $1 and $1.

Is Phi-4 or Sonar better for coding?

Sonar scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.7 versus 34.4 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Both accept 128K tokens.

How many benchmarks do Phi-4 and Sonar share?

7 benchmarks have published results for both models. Phi-4 has 37 scored results on Noometry and Sonar has 7.

Related comparisons

Go deeper