Model comparison

Command R vs Sonar

Sonar is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.5 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index. Command R costs 3.8× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Sonar's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 7 shared benchmarks.

Command R Cohere

31.4

Rank #272 Confirmed

Sonar Perplexity

38.5

Rank #187 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 7 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R scores higher in 0 categories and Sonar in 5 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Sonar leads 52.6 to 38.2.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is LiveBench Language: 16.7% for Command R and 44.1% for Sonar.
  • Command R is cheaper at $0.15 / $0.60 per million input/output tokens, against $1 / $1 for Sonar.
  • Command R has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Command R and Sonar specifications
Command RSonar
ProviderCoherePerplexity
Noometry Index31.438.5
Released2024-08-302024-01-01
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window128K128K
Max output4K4K
Input $ / M tokens$0.15$1
Output $ / M tokens$0.60$1
Results tracked297

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Sonar leads

Command R: 29.3 (#306), Sonar: 35.7 (#221)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand RSonar
LiveBench Coding17.9%35.1%
BigCodeBench Instruct37.1%—
LMArena Coding1169—
BigCodeBench Complete45.2%—

Reasoning Sonar leads

Command R: 13.8 (#331), Sonar: 21.1 (#227)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand RSonar
LiveBench Reasoning21.9%46.3%
LiveBench Data Analysis33.3%37.9%
LiveBench27.5%46.9%
LMArena Hard Prompts1164—
DTBench46.4%—
LMCA9.2%—

Math Sonar leads

Command R: 28.0 (#246), Sonar: 33.7 (#200)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand RSonar
LiveBench Math19.4%41.6%
LMArena Math1155—

Knowledge Not comparable

Command R: 31.0 (#221), Sonar: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand RSonar
LMArena Expert1138—
MMLU65.2%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Command R: 35.7 (#245), Sonar: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand RSonar
LMArena Non-English1174—
LMArena Chinese1182—
LMArena French1162—
LMArena German1176—
LMArena Japanese1143—
LMArena Korean1163—
LMArena Russian1174—
LMArena Spanish1151—

Instruction Following Sonar leads

Command R: 58.1 (#261), Sonar: 71.4 (#150)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand RSonar
LiveBench Instruction Following55.6%76.2%
LMArena Instruction Following1167—

Long Context Not comparable

Command R: 36.3 (#231), Sonar: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand RSonar
LMArena Longer Query1198—

Writing & Preference Sonar leads

Command R: 38.2 (#254), Sonar: 52.6 (#167)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand RSonar
LiveBench Language16.7%44.1%
LMArena Text1187—
LMArena Creative Writing1170—
LMArena Multi-Turn1163—

Frequently asked questions

Is Command R better than Sonar?

Sonar is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.5 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index. Command R costs 3.8× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Sonar's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Command R or Sonar?

Command R is cheaper. It lists at $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens; Sonar lists at $1 and $1.

Is Command R or Sonar better for coding?

Sonar scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.7 versus 29.3 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Both accept 128K tokens.

How many benchmarks do Command R and Sonar share?

7 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R has 29 scored results on Noometry and Sonar has 7.

Related comparisons

Go deeper