Model comparison

Mistral Small 3 vs Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.2 to 30.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Mistral Small 3 scores higher in 5 categories and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct in 3 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads 42.3 to 32.4.

Side by side

Mistral Small 3 and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct specifications
Mistral Small 3Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
ProviderMistral AIAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index30.932.2
Released2025-01-30—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window33K—
Max output16K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.05—
Output $ / M tokens$0.08—
Results tracked2416

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Mistral Small 3 leads

Mistral Small 3: 36.0 (#203), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.6 (#222)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Coding12461210
BigCodeBench Instruct45.3%—
BigCodeBench Complete50.4%—

Reasoning Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads

Mistral Small 3: 18.2 (#269), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 22.6 (#174)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts12331208
Chess Puzzles0%—
Epoch Capabilities Index127.06—

Math Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads

Mistral Small 3: 15.3 (#290), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 24.8 (#255)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Math12401208
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20256.7%—
Omni-MATH—16.1%

Knowledge Mistral Small 3 leads

Mistral Small 3: 25.0 (#258), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.2 (#274)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
GPQA Diamond47.3%—
MMLU-Pro—41.4%
Confabulations25.2%—
GPQA (HELM)—28.7%
LMArena Expert1202—

Multilingual Mistral Small 3 leads

Mistral Small 3: 37.5 (#231), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.0 (#243)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Non-English11981160
LMArena Chinese12041192
LMArena Russian12161187
LMArena French1202—
LMArena German1211—
LMArena Japanese1111—
LMArena Korean1188—

Instruction Following Mistral Small 3 leads

Mistral Small 3: 63.9 (#224), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.8 (#238)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following12141186
IFEval—78%

Long Context Mistral Small 3 leads

Mistral Small 3: 37.8 (#206), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#229)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query12461194

Writing & Preference Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads

Mistral Small 3: 32.4 (#275), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.3 (#231)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Text12341218
LMArena Creative Writing11951199
LMArena Multi-Turn12171221
EQ-Bench Creative Writing707—
WildBench—73.4%

Frequently asked questions

Is Mistral Small 3 better than Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct?

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.2 to 30.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Mistral Small 3 or Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better for coding?

Mistral Small 3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.0 versus 34.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Mistral Small 3 and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Small 3 has 24 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16.

Related comparisons

Go deeper