Model comparison

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct vs Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.7 to 31.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 3.0 8b Instruct scores higher in 2 categories and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct in 6 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads 42.1 to 31.1.

Side by side

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct specifications
Granite 3.0 8b InstructOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
ProviderIBMAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index31.632.7
Released——
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1416

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 29.7 (#301), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.2 (#227)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Coding11121210
BigCodeBench Instruct29.3%—
BigCodeBench Complete35.4%—

Reasoning Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 20.9 (#230), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 23.6 (#175)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts10921208

Math Granite 3.0 8b Instruct leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 32.8 (#210), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 26.8 (#255)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Math11431208
Omni-MATH—16.1%

Knowledge Granite 3.0 8b Instruct leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 29.6 (#236), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.5 (#279)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
MMLU-Pro—41.4%
GPQA (HELM)—28.7%
LMArena Expert1087—

Multilingual Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 27.2 (#276), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.8 (#248)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Non-English10371160
LMArena Chinese10631192
LMArena Russian10601187

Instruction Following Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 56.0 (#276), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.5 (#244)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following10881186
IFEval—78%

Long Context Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 34.0 (#252), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#234)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query11221194

Writing & Preference Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 31.1 (#285), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.1 (#236)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Text10961218
LMArena Creative Writing10711199
LMArena Multi-Turn10631221
WildBench—73.4%

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 3.0 8b Instruct better than Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct?

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.7 to 31.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 3.0 8b Instruct or Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better for coding?

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.2 versus 29.7 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 3.0 8b Instruct and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 3.0 8b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16.

Related comparisons

Go deeper