Model comparison
Command R vs Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.7 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
Cohere
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R scores higher in 4 categories and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct in 4 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Command R leads 31.0 to 19.5.
Side by side
| Command R | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 31.4 | 32.7 |
| Released | 2024-08-30 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 4K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.15 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.60 | — |
| Results tracked | 29 | 16 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
Command R: 29.3 (#306), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.2 (#227)
| Benchmark | Command R | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1169 | 1210 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 37.1% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 17.9% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 45.2% | — |
Reasoning Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
Command R: 13.8 (#331), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 23.6 (#175)
| Benchmark | Command R | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1164 | 1208 |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 21.9% | — |
| DTBench | 46.4% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 33.3% | — |
| LMCA | 9.2% | — |
| LiveBench | 27.5% | — |
Math Command R leads
Command R: 28.0 (#246), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 26.8 (#255)
| Benchmark | Command R | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1155 | 1208 |
| Omni-MATH | — | 16.1% |
| LiveBench Math | 19.4% | — |
Knowledge Command R leads
Command R: 31.0 (#221), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.5 (#279)
| Benchmark | Command R | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | — | 41.4% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 28.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 1138 | — |
| MMLU | 65.2% | — |
Multilingual Too close to call
Command R: 35.7 (#245), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.8 (#248)
| Benchmark | Command R | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1174 | 1160 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1182 | 1192 |
| LMArena Russian | 1174 | 1187 |
| LMArena French | 1162 | — |
| LMArena German | 1176 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1143 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1163 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1151 | — |
Instruction Following Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
Command R: 58.1 (#261), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.5 (#244)
| Benchmark | Command R | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1167 | 1186 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 55.6% | — |
| IFEval | — | 78% |
Long Context Too close to call
Command R: 36.3 (#231), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#234)
| Benchmark | Command R | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1198 | 1194 |
Writing & Preference Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
Command R: 38.2 (#254), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.1 (#236)
| Benchmark | Command R | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1187 | 1218 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1170 | 1199 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1163 | 1221 |
| WildBench | — | 73.4% |
| LiveBench Language | 16.7% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Command R better than Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct?
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.7 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Command R or Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better for coding?
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.2 versus 29.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Command R and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R has 29 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16.