Model comparison

Mistral Small 3.1 vs Step 3

Step 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.5 to 31.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

Mistral Small 3.1 Mistral AI

31.7

Rank #269 Confirmed

Step 3 StepFun

40.5

Rank #149 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Mistral Small 3.1 scores higher in 0 categories and Step 3 in 9 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Step 3 leads 37.6 to 14.7.

Side by side

Mistral Small 3.1 and Step 3 specifications
Mistral Small 3.1Step 3
ProviderMistral AIStepFun
Noometry Index31.740.5
Released2025-03-17—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window128K—
Max output102K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.35—
Output $ / M tokens$0.56—
Results tracked2817

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Step 3 leads

Mistral Small 3.1: 38.3 (#179), Step 3: 40.1 (#147)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.1Step 3
LMArena Coding13091367

Reasoning Step 3 leads

Mistral Small 3.1: 19.7 (#254), Step 3: 28.4 (#105)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.1Step 3
LMArena Hard Prompts12781355
Kagi LLM Benchmark—62.3%
Chess Puzzles1%—
Epoch Capabilities Index127.48—

Math Step 3 leads

Mistral Small 3.1: 14.7 (#301), Step 3: 37.6 (#148)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.1Step 3
LMArena Math12621366
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20253.9%—
Omni-MATH24.8%—

Knowledge Step 3 leads

Mistral Small 3.1: 22.6 (#271), Step 3: 36.8 (#164)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.1Step 3
LMArena Expert12571333
GPQA Diamond41.9%—
MMLU-Pro61%—
GPQA (HELM)39.2%—

Multimodal Step 3 leads

Mistral Small 3.1: 33.2 (#99), Step 3: 35.5 (#86)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.1Step 3
LMArena Vision11361177

Multilingual Step 3 leads

Mistral Small 3.1: 41.2 (#209), Step 3: 46.3 (#159)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.1Step 3
LMArena Non-English12551327
LMArena Chinese12531397
LMArena German12661371
LMArena Korean12061269
LMArena Russian12631331
LMArena Spanish12831371
LMArena French1273—
LMArena Japanese1208—

Instruction Following Step 3 leads

Mistral Small 3.1: 63.6 (#230), Step 3: 70.4 (#164)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.1Step 3
LMArena Instruction Following12641332
IFEval75%—

Long Context Too close to call

Mistral Small 3.1: 39.5 (#178), Step 3: 40.3 (#157)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.1Step 3
LMArena Longer Query12991326

Writing & Preference Step 3 leads

Mistral Small 3.1: 37.0 (#259), Step 3: 54.3 (#151)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.1Step 3
LMArena Text12771350
LMArena Creative Writing12531321
LMArena Multi-Turn12701341
EQ-Bench Creative Writing761—
WildBench78.8%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Mistral Small 3.1 better than Step 3?

Step 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.5 to 31.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Mistral Small 3.1 or Step 3 better for coding?

Step 3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.1 versus 38.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Mistral Small 3.1 and Step 3 share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Small 3.1 has 28 scored results on Noometry and Step 3 has 17.

Related comparisons

Go deeper