Model comparison
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat vs Step 3
Step 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.
NVIDIA
StepFunSummary
- They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat scores higher in 0 categories and Step 3 in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Step 3 leads 54.5 to 31.8.
Side by side
| Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Step 3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | NVIDIA | StepFun |
| Noometry Index | 31.2 | 39.9 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 9 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Step 3 leads
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 29.3 (#295), Step 3: 39.5 (#144)
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1025 | 1367 |
Reasoning Step 3 leads
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 19.1 (#245), Step 3: 27.6 (#102)
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1047 | 1355 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 62.3% |
Math Step 3 leads
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 28.8 (#223), Step 3: 34.9 (#148)
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1072 | 1366 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: —, Step 3: 36.2 (#161)
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1333 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: —, Step 3: 34.9 (#81)
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1176 |
Multilingual Step 3 leads
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 28.9 (#265), Step 3: 46.5 (#154)
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1064 | 1327 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1396 |
| LMArena German | — | 1371 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1271 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1331 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1372 |
Instruction Following Step 3 leads
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 54.5 (#274), Step 3: 70.6 (#159)
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1061 | 1332 |
Long Context Step 3 leads
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 30.4 (#283), Step 3: 40.3 (#152)
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 998 | 1326 |
Writing & Preference Step 3 leads
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 31.8 (#278), Step 3: 54.5 (#146)
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1098 | 1351 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1091 | 1322 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1058 | 1340 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat better than Step 3?
Step 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat or Step 3 better for coding?
Step 3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.5 versus 29.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat and Step 3 share?
9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat has 9 scored results on Noometry and Step 3 has 17.