Model comparison

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct vs Step 3

Step 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 31.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct Alibaba (Qwen)

31.5

Rank #259 Confirmed

Step 3 StepFun

39.9

Rank #145 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen2.5 72B Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Step 3 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Step 3 leads 34.9 to 18.1.

Side by side

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct and Step 3 specifications
Qwen2.5 72B InstructStep 3
ProviderAlibaba (Qwen)StepFun
Noometry Index31.539.9
Released2024-09—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window131K—
Max output8K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.40—
Output $ / M tokens$5.60—
Results tracked4317

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Step 3 leads

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 32.8 (#256), Step 3: 39.5 (#144)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen2.5 72B InstructStep 3
LMArena Coding12931367
WeirdML16%—
BigCodeBench Instruct45.8%—
BigCodeBench Complete55.9%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 22.0 (#124), Step 3: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen2.5 72B InstructStep 3
TheAgentCompany5.7%—
BALROG16.2%—
METR Time Horizons35.8%—

Reasoning Step 3 leads

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 21.4 (#197), Step 3: 27.6 (#102)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen2.5 72B InstructStep 3
LMArena Hard Prompts12711355
Kagi LLM Benchmark—62.3%
DTBench62.9%—
LMCA13.4%—
BIG-Bench Hard79.8%—
Epoch Capabilities Index129.01—
ForecastBench57.5—
HellaSwag84.8%—
PIQA82.6%—
WinoGrande82.3%—

Math Step 3 leads

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 18.1 (#281), Step 3: 34.9 (#148)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen2.5 72B InstructStep 3
LMArena Math12831366
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20258.1%—
Omni-MATH33%—
MATH Level 563.2%—

Knowledge Step 3 leads

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 26.9 (#247), Step 3: 36.2 (#161)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen2.5 72B InstructStep 3
LMArena Expert12451333
GPQA Diamond49.1%—
MMLU-Pro63.1%—
Confabulations19.1%—
GPQA (HELM)42.6%—
ARC (AI2) Challenge94.5%—
MMLU85.3%—
TriviaQA71.9%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: —, Step 3: 34.9 (#81)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen2.5 72B InstructStep 3
LMArena Vision—1176

Multilingual Step 3 leads

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 41.2 (#208), Step 3: 46.5 (#154)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen2.5 72B InstructStep 3
LMArena Non-English12521327
LMArena Chinese12721396
LMArena German12341371
LMArena Korean11881271
LMArena Russian12641331
LMArena Spanish12551372
LMArena French1279—
LMArena Japanese1180—

Instruction Following Step 3 leads

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 65.7 (#216), Step 3: 70.6 (#159)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen2.5 72B InstructStep 3
LMArena Instruction Following12541332
IFEval80.6%—

Long Context Step 3 leads

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 38.9 (#183), Step 3: 40.3 (#152)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen2.5 72B InstructStep 3
LMArena Longer Query12821326

Writing & Preference Step 3 leads

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 46.9 (#210), Step 3: 54.5 (#146)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen2.5 72B InstructStep 3
LMArena Text12691351
LMArena Creative Writing12211322
LMArena Multi-Turn12721340
WildBench80.2%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Qwen2.5 72B Instruct better than Step 3?

Step 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 31.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is Qwen2.5 72B Instruct or Step 3 better for coding?

Step 3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.5 versus 32.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Qwen2.5 72B Instruct and Step 3 share?

15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen2.5 72B Instruct has 43 scored results on Noometry and Step 3 has 17.

Related comparisons

Go deeper