Model comparison
Mistral Nemo vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Qwen3 Coder Next is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.3 to 26.4 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Nemo costs 1.9× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3 Coder Next's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Mistral AI
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- Mistral Nemo is cheaper at $0.15 / $0.15 per million input/output tokens, against $0.12 / $0.80 for Qwen3 Coder Next.
- Qwen3 Coder Next accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 128K.
Side by side
| Mistral Nemo | Qwen3 Coder Next | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 26.4 | 34.3 |
| Released | 2024-07-01 | 2026-02-02 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | 262K |
| Max output | 128K | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.15 | $0.12 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.15 | $0.80 |
| Results tracked | 10 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Mistral Nemo: —, Qwen3 Coder Next: 36.3 (#210)
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Mistral Nemo: 23.5 (#125), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 27.6% | — |
| BALROG | 17.6% | — |
Reasoning Qwen3 Coder Next leads
Mistral Nemo: 20.7 (#232), Qwen3 Coder Next: 22.4 (#196)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| DTBench | 48.6% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 118.68 | — |
| PIQA | 83.5% | — |
Math Not comparable
Mistral Nemo: 25.5 (#268), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| MATH Level 5 | 10.8% | — |
| GSM8K | 84.2% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Mistral Nemo: 12.3 (#298), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 29.9% | — |
| BoolQ | 82.5% | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Mistral Nemo: 28.5 (#296), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 881 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Mistral Nemo better than Qwen3 Coder Next?
Qwen3 Coder Next is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.3 to 26.4 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Nemo costs 1.9× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3 Coder Next's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, Mistral Nemo or Qwen3 Coder Next?
Mistral Nemo is cheaper. It lists at $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.15 per million output tokens; Qwen3 Coder Next lists at $0.12 and $0.80.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen3 Coder Next does, with 262K tokens against 128K.
How many benchmarks do Mistral Nemo and Qwen3 Coder Next share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Nemo has 10 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Coder Next has 3.