Model comparison
Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Mistral Nemo
Claude 3.5 Sonnet is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.6 to 26.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 6 shared benchmarks.
Mistral AISummary
- They share 6 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3.5 Sonnet scores higher in 4 categories and Mistral Nemo in 1 category; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads 52.9 to 28.5.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 56.9% for Claude 3.5 Sonnet and 10.8% for Mistral Nemo.
- Mistral Nemo has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Mistral Nemo | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 34.6 | 26.4 |
| Released | 2024-06-20 | 2024-07-01 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 128K |
| Max output | — | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.15 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.15 |
| Results tracked | 60 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 39.0 (#165), Mistral Nemo: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 51.6% | — |
| GSO | 4.6% | — |
| WeirdML | 40% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 46.8% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 67.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1342 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 58.6% | — |
| CadEval | 48% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 81.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 74.3% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 32.3 (#67), Mistral Nemo: 23.5 (#125)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | 32.6% | 17.6% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 27.6% |
| TheAgentCompany | 24% | — |
| Cybench | 17.5% | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 45.2% | — |
Reasoning Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 23.1 (#183), Mistral Nemo: 20.7 (#232)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| DTBench | 67.8% | 48.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 133.55 | 118.68 |
| SimpleBench | 41.4% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 0.9% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 56.7% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1305 | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 55% | — |
| ForecastBench | 60.7 | — |
| LiveBench | 59% | — |
| PIQA | — | 83.5% |
Math Mistral Nemo leads
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 19.2 (#288), Mistral Nemo: 25.5 (#268)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| MATH Level 5 | 56.9% | 10.8% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 8.5% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 27.6% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 52.3% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1307 | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 2.1% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 0% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 84.2% |
Knowledge Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 28.6 (#245), Mistral Nemo: 12.3 (#298)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 55.3% | 29.9% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 4.1% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 77.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 19.9% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 56.5% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1265 | — |
| BoolQ | — | 82.5% |
| MMLU | 87.3% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 26.5 (#120), Mistral Nemo: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1125 | — |
| Video-MME | 60% | — |
| GeoBench | 62% | — |
| VPCT | 33% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 43.2 (#185), Mistral Nemo: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1283 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1272 | — |
| LMArena French | 1305 | — |
| LMArena German | 1297 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1234 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1200 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1306 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1290 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 68.8 (#182), Mistral Nemo: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 69.3% | — |
| IFEval | 85.5% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1297 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 39.9 (#167), Mistral Nemo: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1311 | — |
Writing & Preference Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.5 Sonnet: 52.9 (#164), Mistral Nemo: 28.5 (#296)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1451 | 881 |
| LMArena Text | 1298 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1292 | — |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 80.3% | — |
| WildBench | 79.2% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1326 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 53.8% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 3.5 Sonnet better than Mistral Nemo?
Claude 3.5 Sonnet is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.6 to 26.4 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Mistral Nemo share?
6 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3.5 Sonnet has 60 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Nemo has 10.