Model comparison
Mistral Nemo vs Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Nemo costs 20× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Mistral AI
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads 55.5 to 28.6.
- Mistral Nemo is cheaper at $0.15 / $0.15 per million input/output tokens, against $1.50 / $7.50 for Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct.
- Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 128K.
Side by side
| Mistral Nemo | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 25.9 | 37.7 |
| Released | 2024-07-01 | 2025-04 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | 262K |
| Max output | 128K | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.15 | $1.50 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.15 | $7.50 |
| Results tracked | 10 | 25 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Mistral Nemo: —, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 36.2 (#199)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 55.4% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1275 |
| GSO | — | 4.9% |
| WeirdML | — | 41.2% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1413 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 461.45 |
| AlgoTune | — | 1.44 |
Agentic & Tool Use Too close to call
Mistral Nemo: 23.3 (#118), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 23.7 (#116)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 27.2% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 27.6% | — |
| BALROG | 17.6% | — |
Reasoning Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads
Mistral Nemo: 19.9 (#230), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 24.7 (#141)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 49.5% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1372 |
| DTBench | 48.6% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 118.63 | — |
| PIQA | 83.5% | — |
Math Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads
Mistral Nemo: 23.5 (#263), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 34.9 (#151)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1364 |
| MATH Level 5 | 10.8% | — |
| GSM8K | 84.2% | — |
Knowledge Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads
Mistral Nemo: 12.3 (#293), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 36.4 (#159)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 29.9% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1337 |
| BoolQ | 82.5% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Mistral Nemo: —, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 47.8 (#143)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1345 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1356 |
| LMArena French | — | 1394 |
| LMArena German | — | 1324 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1309 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1307 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1367 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1360 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Mistral Nemo: —, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 71.8 (#142)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1356 |
Long Context Not comparable
Mistral Nemo: —, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 42.0 (#126)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1379 |
Writing & Preference Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads
Mistral Nemo: 28.6 (#291), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 55.5 (#142)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1356 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1333 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 881 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1365 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Mistral Nemo better than Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct?
Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Nemo costs 20× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, Mistral Nemo or Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct?
Mistral Nemo is cheaper. It lists at $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.15 per million output tokens; Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct lists at $1.50 and $7.50.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct does, with 262K tokens against 128K.
How many benchmarks do Mistral Nemo and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Nemo has 10 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct has 25.