Model comparison

Qwen3-1.7B vs Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct

Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 26.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Qwen3-1.7B Alibaba (Qwen)

26.2

Rank #331 Reported

Summary

  • The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads 34.9 to 15.4.

Side by side

Qwen3-1.7B and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct specifications
Qwen3-1.7BQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
ProviderAlibaba (Qwen)Alibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index26.237.7
Released2025-04-292025-04
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.50
Output $ / M tokens—$7.50
Results tracked425

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Qwen3-1.7B: —, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 36.2 (#199)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3-1.7BQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—55.4%
LMArena WebDev—1275
GSO—4.9%
WeirdML—41.2%
LMArena Coding—1413
ALE-Bench—461.45
AlgoTune—1.44

Agentic & Tool Use Too close to call

Qwen3-1.7B: 24.5 (#108), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 23.7 (#116)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3-1.7BQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
Terminal-Bench—27.2%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard28.4%—

Reasoning Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads

Qwen3-1.7B: 18.5 (#263), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 24.7 (#141)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3-1.7BQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
Kagi LLM Benchmark—49.5%
Chess Puzzles0%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1372

Math Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads

Qwen3-1.7B: 15.4 (#288), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 34.9 (#151)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3-1.7BQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20258.1%—
LMArena Math—1364

Knowledge Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads

Qwen3-1.7B: 19.6 (#273), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 36.4 (#159)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3-1.7BQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
GPQA Diamond38%—
LMArena Expert—1337

Multilingual Not comparable

Qwen3-1.7B: —, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 47.8 (#143)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3-1.7BQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Non-English—1345
LMArena Chinese—1356
LMArena French—1394
LMArena German—1324
LMArena Japanese—1309
LMArena Korean—1307
LMArena Russian—1367
LMArena Spanish—1360

Instruction Following Not comparable

Qwen3-1.7B: —, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 71.8 (#142)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3-1.7BQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following—1356

Long Context Not comparable

Qwen3-1.7B: —, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 42.0 (#126)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3-1.7BQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Longer Query—1379

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Qwen3-1.7B: —, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 55.5 (#142)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3-1.7BQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Text—1356
LMArena Creative Writing—1333
LMArena Multi-Turn—1365

Frequently asked questions

Is Qwen3-1.7B better than Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct?

Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 26.2 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Qwen3-1.7B and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen3-1.7B has 4 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct has 25.

Related comparisons

Go deeper