Model comparison
Mistral Nemo vs Nova Premier 1.0
Nova Premier 1.0 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Nemo costs 33× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Nova Premier 1.0's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Mistral AISummary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Nova Premier 1.0 leads 35.4 to 12.3.
- Mistral Nemo is cheaper at $0.15 / $0.15 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $12.50 for Nova Premier 1.0.
- Nova Premier 1.0 accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 128K.
- Mistral Nemo has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Mistral Nemo | Nova Premier 1.0 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Amazon |
| Noometry Index | 25.9 | 37.7 |
| Released | 2024-07-01 | 2025-04-30 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 128K | 1M |
| Max output | 128K | 10K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.15 | $2.50 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.15 | $12.50 |
| Results tracked | 10 | 6 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Mistral Nemo: 23.3 (#118), Nova Premier 1.0: —
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Nova Premier 1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 27.6% | — |
| BALROG | 17.6% | — |
Reasoning Nova Premier 1.0 leads
Mistral Nemo: 19.9 (#230), Nova Premier 1.0: 22.3 (#182)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Nova Premier 1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 44.8% |
| DTBench | 48.6% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 118.63 | — |
| PIQA | 83.5% | — |
Math Nova Premier 1.0 leads
Mistral Nemo: 23.5 (#263), Nova Premier 1.0: 31.5 (#194)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Nova Premier 1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | — | 35% |
| MATH Level 5 | 10.8% | — |
| GSM8K | 84.2% | — |
Knowledge Nova Premier 1.0 leads
Mistral Nemo: 12.3 (#293), Nova Premier 1.0: 35.4 (#176)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Nova Premier 1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 29.9% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 72.6% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 51.8% |
| BoolQ | 82.5% | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Mistral Nemo: —, Nova Premier 1.0: 66.9 (#201)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Nova Premier 1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | — | 80.3% |
Writing & Preference Nova Premier 1.0 leads
Mistral Nemo: 28.6 (#291), Nova Premier 1.0: 51.0 (#174)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Nova Premier 1.0 |
|---|---|---|
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 881 | — |
| WildBench | — | 78.8% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Mistral Nemo better than Nova Premier 1.0?
Nova Premier 1.0 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Nemo costs 33× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Nova Premier 1.0's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, Mistral Nemo or Nova Premier 1.0?
Mistral Nemo is cheaper. It lists at $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.15 per million output tokens; Nova Premier 1.0 lists at $2.50 and $12.50.
Which has the bigger context window?
Nova Premier 1.0 does, with 1M tokens against 128K.
How many benchmarks do Mistral Nemo and Nova Premier 1.0 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Nemo has 10 scored results on Noometry and Nova Premier 1.0 has 6.