Model comparison
Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct vs Qwen Turbo
Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.3 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Microsoft
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct leads 27.6 to 15.3.
- Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct | Qwen Turbo | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 29.3 | 27.1 |
| Released | 2024-04-23 | 2024-11-01 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 16K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.05 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.20 |
| Results tracked | 32 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 27.9 (#318), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Coding | 20.3% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1101 | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 14.8 (#323), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Reasoning | 15.9% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1100 | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 30.3% | — |
| Adversarial NLI | 58.1% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 79.1% | — |
| HellaSwag | 77% | — |
| LiveBench | 24% | — |
| WinoGrande | 81.5% | — |
Math Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct leads
Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 27.6 (#248), Qwen Turbo: 15.3 (#297)
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 6.1% |
| LiveBench Math | 17.6% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1151 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 56.2% |
Knowledge Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct leads
Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 29.1 (#240), Qwen Turbo: 22.2 (#272)
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 41.8% |
| LMArena Expert | 1067 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 90.7% | — |
| MMLU | 75.7% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 88% | — |
| TriviaQA | 58.1% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 28.5 (#272), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1058 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1061 | — |
| LMArena French | 1135 | — |
| LMArena German | 1080 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 966 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 894 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1111 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1111 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 51.9 (#292), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 47.2% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1087 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 33.0 (#267), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1088 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 31.1 (#284), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1110 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1083 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1068 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 12.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct better than Qwen Turbo?
Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.3 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct and Qwen Turbo share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct has 32 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Turbo has 3.