Model comparison
Mistral Nemo vs Olmo 3.1 32b Think
Olmo 3.1 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.9 to 26.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Mistral AI
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads 35.7 to 12.3.
Side by side
| Mistral Nemo | Olmo 3.1 32b Think | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 26.4 | 37.9 |
| Released | 2024-07-01 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.15 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.15 | — |
| Results tracked | 10 | 15 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Mistral Nemo: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 37.7 (#189)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1291 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Mistral Nemo: 23.5 (#125), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: —
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 27.6% | — |
| BALROG | 17.6% | — |
Reasoning Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads
Mistral Nemo: 20.7 (#232), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 25.2 (#150)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1272 |
| DTBench | 48.6% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 118.68 | — |
| PIQA | 83.5% | — |
Math Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads
Mistral Nemo: 25.5 (#268), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 36.3 (#168)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1305 |
| MATH Level 5 | 10.8% | — |
| GSM8K | 84.2% | — |
Knowledge Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads
Mistral Nemo: 12.3 (#298), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 35.7 (#181)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 29.9% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1295 |
| BoolQ | 82.5% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Mistral Nemo: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.1 (#231)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1209 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1242 |
| LMArena French | — | 1260 |
| LMArena German | — | 1262 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1193 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1289 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Mistral Nemo: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 65.6 (#218)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1247 |
Long Context Not comparable
Mistral Nemo: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.6 (#195)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1272 |
Writing & Preference Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads
Mistral Nemo: 28.5 (#296), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 46.2 (#220)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1272 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1226 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 881 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1252 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Mistral Nemo better than Olmo 3.1 32b Think?
Olmo 3.1 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.9 to 26.4 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Mistral Nemo and Olmo 3.1 32b Think share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Nemo has 10 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Think has 15.