Model comparison

Mistral Medium 3.5 vs Solar Pro4

Solar Pro4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 40.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Mistral Medium 3.5 Mistral AI

40.2

Rank #152 Confirmed

Solar Pro4 Upstage

42.1

Rank #121 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Mistral Medium 3.5 scores higher in 6 categories and Solar Pro4 in 2 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Solar Pro4 leads 28.5 to 17.3.
  • Solar Pro4 is cheaper at $0.30 / $1.20 per million input/output tokens, against $1.50 / $7.50 for Mistral Medium 3.5.
  • Solar Pro4 accepts more context: 524K tokens versus 262K.
  • Mistral Medium 3.5 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Mistral Medium 3.5 and Solar Pro4 specifications
Mistral Medium 3.5Solar Pro4
ProviderMistral AIUpstage
Noometry Index40.242.1
Released—2026-08-06
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window262K524K
Max output210K131K
Input $ / M tokens$1.50$0.30
Output $ / M tokens$7.50$1.20
Results tracked2218

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Solar Pro4 leads

Mistral Medium 3.5: 36.0 (#213), Solar Pro4: 40.1 (#149)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5Solar Pro4
LMArena WebDev12641371
LMArena Coding14611437

Reasoning Solar Pro4 leads

Mistral Medium 3.5: 17.3 (#295), Solar Pro4: 28.5 (#104)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5Solar Pro4
LMArena Hard Prompts14361399
Kagi LLM Benchmark41.4%—
NYT Connections (extended)12.9%—
Epoch Capabilities Index141.35—

Math Too close to call

Mistral Medium 3.5: 39.1 (#113), Solar Pro4: 38.8 (#128)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5Solar Pro4
LMArena Math14311416

Knowledge Too close to call

Mistral Medium 3.5: 40.0 (#126), Solar Pro4: 39.8 (#129)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5Solar Pro4
LMArena Expert14321427

Multimodal Not comparable

Mistral Medium 3.5: 38.3 (#65), Solar Pro4: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5Solar Pro4
LMArena Vision1223—

Multilingual Mistral Medium 3.5 leads

Mistral Medium 3.5: 51.9 (#100), Solar Pro4: 48.7 (#139)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5Solar Pro4
LMArena Non-English14041361
LMArena Chinese14421415
LMArena French14481397
LMArena German14511364
LMArena Korean13851382
LMArena Russian13951360
LMArena Spanish14091401
LMArena Japanese—1309

Instruction Following Mistral Medium 3.5 leads

Mistral Medium 3.5: 74.6 (#90), Solar Pro4: 72.7 (#132)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5Solar Pro4
LMArena Instruction Following14151377

Long Context Mistral Medium 3.5 leads

Mistral Medium 3.5: 43.2 (#103), Solar Pro4: 42.1 (#130)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5Solar Pro4
LMArena Longer Query14151381

Writing & Preference Mistral Medium 3.5 leads

Mistral Medium 3.5: 58.5 (#117), Solar Pro4: 56.5 (#138)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.5Solar Pro4
LMArena Text14211386
LMArena Creative Writing13741316
LMArena Multi-Turn14231385
EQ-Bench 4993—

Frequently asked questions

Is Mistral Medium 3.5 better than Solar Pro4?

Solar Pro4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 40.2 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Mistral Medium 3.5 or Solar Pro4?

Solar Pro4 is cheaper. It lists at $0.30 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens; Mistral Medium 3.5 lists at $1.50 and $7.50.

Is Mistral Medium 3.5 or Solar Pro4 better for coding?

Solar Pro4 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.1 versus 36.0 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Solar Pro4 does, with 524K tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks do Mistral Medium 3.5 and Solar Pro4 share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Medium 3.5 has 22 scored results on Noometry and Solar Pro4 has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper