Model comparison
GLM-4.5 vs Mistral Medium 3.5
GLM-4.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.0 to 40.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.5 scores higher in 3 categories and Mistral Medium 3.5 in 5 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where GLM-4.5 leads 28.6 to 17.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Kagi LLM Benchmark: 57.9% for GLM-4.5 and 41.4% for Mistral Medium 3.5.
- GLM-4.5 is cheaper at $0.60 / $2.20 per million input/output tokens, against $1.50 / $7.50 for Mistral Medium 3.5.
- Mistral Medium 3.5 accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 131K.
Side by side
| GLM-4.5 | Mistral Medium 3.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 42.0 | 40.2 |
| Released | 2025-07-27 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 131K | 262K |
| Max output | 98K | 210K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.60 | $1.50 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $2.20 | $7.50 |
| Results tracked | 27 | 22 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GLM-4.5 leads
GLM-4.5: 41.4 (#125), Mistral Medium 3.5: 36.0 (#213)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5 | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1434 | 1461 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 54.2% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1264 |
| WeirdML | 40.6% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 344.82 | — |
| AlgoTune | 1.52 | — |
Reasoning GLM-4.5 leads
GLM-4.5: 28.6 (#100), Mistral Medium 3.5: 17.3 (#295)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5 | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 57.9% | 41.4% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1429 | 1436 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 12.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 141.35 |
Math Too close to call
GLM-4.5: 39.0 (#116), Mistral Medium 3.5: 39.1 (#113)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5 | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1427 | 1431 |
Knowledge Mistral Medium 3.5 leads
GLM-4.5: 35.9 (#179), Mistral Medium 3.5: 40.0 (#126)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5 | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1433 | 1432 |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 8.3% | — |
| Confabulations | 11.3% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
GLM-4.5: —, Mistral Medium 3.5: 38.3 (#65)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5 | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1223 |
Multilingual Too close to call
GLM-4.5: 52.8 (#77), Mistral Medium 3.5: 51.9 (#100)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5 | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1417 | 1404 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1465 | 1442 |
| LMArena French | 1418 | 1448 |
| LMArena German | 1407 | 1451 |
| LMArena Korean | 1380 | 1385 |
| LMArena Russian | 1414 | 1395 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1454 | 1409 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1415 | — |
Instruction Following Too close to call
GLM-4.5: 74.1 (#104), Mistral Medium 3.5: 74.6 (#90)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5 | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1404 | 1415 |
Long Context Mistral Medium 3.5 leads
GLM-4.5: 38.2 (#201), Mistral Medium 3.5: 43.2 (#103)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5 | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1412 | 1415 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 58.3% | — |
Writing & Preference Too close to call
GLM-4.5: 57.5 (#127), Mistral Medium 3.5: 58.5 (#117)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5 | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1430 | 1421 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1395 | 1374 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1415 | 1423 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 73.4% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1343 | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 993 |
Frequently asked questions
Is GLM-4.5 better than Mistral Medium 3.5?
GLM-4.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.0 to 40.2 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, GLM-4.5 or Mistral Medium 3.5?
GLM-4.5 is cheaper. It lists at $0.60 per million input tokens and $2.20 per million output tokens; Mistral Medium 3.5 lists at $1.50 and $7.50.
Is GLM-4.5 or Mistral Medium 3.5 better for coding?
GLM-4.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.4 versus 36.0 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Mistral Medium 3.5 does, with 262K tokens against 131K.
How many benchmarks do GLM-4.5 and Mistral Medium 3.5 share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.5 has 27 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Medium 3.5 has 22.