Model comparison
Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Olmo 3 32b Think
Olmo 3 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.7 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Mistral AI
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Olmo 3 32b Think leads 25.9 to 10.6.
- Olmo 3 32b Think has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Mistral Medium 3.1 | Olmo 3 32b Think | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 31.9 | 38.7 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 131K | — |
| Max output | 105K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.40 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $2 | — |
| Results tracked | 3 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Mistral Medium 3.1: —, Olmo 3 32b Think: 38.6 (#172)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1319 |
Reasoning Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Mistral Medium 3.1: 10.6 (#341), Olmo 3 32b Think: 25.9 (#140)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 6.5% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 20.3% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1302 |
Math Not comparable
Mistral Medium 3.1: —, Olmo 3 32b Think: 36.5 (#165)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1316 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Mistral Medium 3.1: —, Olmo 3 32b Think: 35.0 (#190)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1273 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Mistral Medium 3.1: —, Olmo 3 32b Think: 41.2 (#210)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1255 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1300 |
| LMArena French | — | 1291 |
| LMArena German | — | 1290 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1254 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Mistral Medium 3.1: —, Olmo 3 32b Think: 67.2 (#198)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1275 |
Long Context Not comparable
Mistral Medium 3.1: —, Olmo 3 32b Think: 39.4 (#182)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1296 |
Writing & Preference Mistral Medium 3.1 leads
Mistral Medium 3.1: 55.5 (#145), Olmo 3 32b Think: 49.1 (#193)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1300 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1256 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1476 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1290 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Mistral Medium 3.1 better than Olmo 3 32b Think?
Olmo 3 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.7 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Mistral Medium 3.1 and Olmo 3 32b Think share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Medium 3.1 has 3 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3 32b Think has 14.