Model comparison
Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Qwen2.5 Plus 1127
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Mistral AI
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads 25.9 to 10.6.
Side by side
| Mistral Medium 3.1 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 31.9 | 38.8 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 131K | — |
| Max output | 105K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.40 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $2 | — |
| Results tracked | 3 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Mistral Medium 3.1: —, Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 38.5 (#175)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1314 |
Reasoning Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Mistral Medium 3.1: 10.6 (#341), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 25.9 (#141)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 6.5% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 20.3% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1299 |
Math Not comparable
Mistral Medium 3.1: —, Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 36.1 (#174)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1298 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Mistral Medium 3.1: —, Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 35.5 (#183)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1289 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Mistral Medium 3.1: —, Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 41.9 (#201)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1265 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1314 |
| LMArena German | — | 1231 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1207 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1271 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Mistral Medium 3.1: —, Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 67.2 (#199)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1275 |
Long Context Not comparable
Mistral Medium 3.1: —, Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 39.2 (#184)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1292 |
Writing & Preference Mistral Medium 3.1 leads
Mistral Medium 3.1: 55.5 (#145), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 49.4 (#192)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1299 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1262 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1476 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1299 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Mistral Medium 3.1 better than Qwen2.5 Plus 1127?
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Mistral Medium 3.1 and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Medium 3.1 has 3 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 has 14.