Noometry

Model comparison

Amazon Nova Lite vs Olmo 3 32b Think

Olmo 3 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.7 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.

Amazon Nova Lite Amazon

31.9

Rank #265 Confirmed

Olmo 3 32b Think Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)

38.7

Rank #183 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Lite scores higher in 0 categories and Olmo 3 32b Think in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Olmo 3 32b Think leads 36.5 to 27.8.
  • Olmo 3 32b Think has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Amazon Nova LiteOlmo 3 32b Think
ProviderAmazonAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index31.938.7
Released2024-12-03—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window300K—
Max output10K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.06—
Output $ / M tokens$0.24—
Results tracked3414

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Olmo 3 32b Think leads

Amazon Nova Lite: 32.5 (#270), Olmo 3 32b Think: 38.6 (#172)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova LiteOlmo 3 32b Think
LMArena Coding12391319
LiveBench Coding27.5%—
ALE-Bench236.25—

Reasoning Olmo 3 32b Think leads

Amazon Nova Lite: 19.3 (#260), Olmo 3 32b Think: 25.9 (#140)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova LiteOlmo 3 32b Think
LMArena Hard Prompts12201302
LiveBench Reasoning36.7%—
LiveBench Data Analysis37.2%—
LiveBench36.4%—

Math Olmo 3 32b Think leads

Amazon Nova Lite: 27.8 (#247), Olmo 3 32b Think: 36.5 (#165)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova LiteOlmo 3 32b Think
LMArena Math12271316
Omni-MATH23.3%—
LiveBench Math36.7%—

Knowledge Olmo 3 32b Think leads

Amazon Nova Lite: 26.3 (#259), Olmo 3 32b Think: 35.0 (#190)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova LiteOlmo 3 32b Think
LMArena Expert12011273
Humanity's Last Exam3.6%—
MMLU-Pro60%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate6.1%—
GPQA (HELM)39.7%—
MMLU77%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Amazon Nova Lite: 25.5 (#123), Olmo 3 32b Think: —

BenchmarkAmazon Nova LiteOlmo 3 32b Think
LMArena Vision990—

Multilingual Olmo 3 32b Think leads

Amazon Nova Lite: 38.0 (#232), Olmo 3 32b Think: 41.2 (#210)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova LiteOlmo 3 32b Think
LMArena Non-English12081255
LMArena Chinese12251300
LMArena French12371291
LMArena German12291290
LMArena Russian12161254
LMArena Japanese1153—
LMArena Korean1153—
LMArena Spanish1226—

Instruction Following Olmo 3 32b Think leads

Amazon Nova Lite: 59.3 (#255), Olmo 3 32b Think: 67.2 (#198)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova LiteOlmo 3 32b Think
LMArena Instruction Following12051275
LiveBench Instruction Following54.1%—
IFEval77.6%—

Long Context Olmo 3 32b Think leads

Amazon Nova Lite: 37.4 (#217), Olmo 3 32b Think: 39.4 (#182)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova LiteOlmo 3 32b Think
LMArena Longer Query12341296

Writing & Preference Olmo 3 32b Think leads

Amazon Nova Lite: 42.1 (#237), Olmo 3 32b Think: 49.1 (#193)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova LiteOlmo 3 32b Think
LMArena Text12291300
LMArena Creative Writing11971256
LMArena Multi-Turn11991290
WildBench75%—
LiveBench Language25.9%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Amazon Nova Lite better than Olmo 3 32b Think?

Olmo 3 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.7 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Amazon Nova Lite or Olmo 3 32b Think better for coding?

Olmo 3 32b Think scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.6 versus 32.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Lite and Olmo 3 32b Think share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Lite has 34 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3 32b Think has 14.

Related comparisons

Go deeper