Model comparison

Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Muse Spark

Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.6 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Mistral Medium 3.1 Mistral AI

31.9

Rank #266 Reported

Muse Spark Meta

50.6

Rank #46 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Muse Spark leads 35.9 to 10.6.

Side by side

Mistral Medium 3.1 and Muse Spark specifications
Mistral Medium 3.1Muse Spark
ProviderMistral AIMeta
Noometry Index31.950.6
Released—2026-04-08
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window131K—
Max output105K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.40—
Output $ / M tokens$2—
Results tracked327

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Mistral Medium 3.1: —, Muse Spark: 46.2 (#69)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.1Muse Spark
SciCode—51.5%
LMArena Coding—1481

Reasoning Muse Spark leads

Mistral Medium 3.1: 10.6 (#341), Muse Spark: 35.9 (#67)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.1Muse Spark
NYT Connections (extended)6.5%—
CritPt—11.3%
Thematic Generalization20.3%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1474
Epoch Capabilities Index—152.04

Math Not comparable

Mistral Medium 3.1: —, Muse Spark: 47.8 (#66)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.1Muse Spark
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—88.9%
ProofBench—17%
LMArena Math—1455
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—39%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—14.6%

Knowledge Not comparable

Mistral Medium 3.1: —, Muse Spark: 65.7 (#13)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.1Muse Spark
GPQA Diamond—89.8%
Humanity's Last Exam—40.6%
LMArena Expert—1457

Multimodal Not comparable

Mistral Medium 3.1: —, Muse Spark: 43.4 (#24)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.1Muse Spark
LMArena Vision—1306
LMArena Document—1444

Multilingual Not comparable

Mistral Medium 3.1: —, Muse Spark: 56.1 (#24)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.1Muse Spark
LMArena Non-English—1464
LMArena Chinese—1509
LMArena French—1497
LMArena German—1497
LMArena Korean—1459
LMArena Russian—1466
LMArena Spanish—1472

Instruction Following Not comparable

Mistral Medium 3.1: —, Muse Spark: 75.9 (#51)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.1Muse Spark
LMArena Instruction Following—1442

Long Context Not comparable

Mistral Medium 3.1: —, Muse Spark: 44.4 (#69)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.1Muse Spark
LMArena Longer Query—1451

Writing & Preference Muse Spark leads

Mistral Medium 3.1: 55.5 (#145), Muse Spark: 66.0 (#39)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.1Muse Spark
LMArena Text—1474
LMArena Creative Writing—1459
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1476—
LMArena Multi-Turn—1477

Frequently asked questions

Is Mistral Medium 3.1 better than Muse Spark?

Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.6 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Mistral Medium 3.1 and Muse Spark share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Medium 3.1 has 3 scored results on Noometry and Muse Spark has 27.

Related comparisons

Go deeper