Model comparison

Muse Spark vs Qwen3-4B

Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.6 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

Muse Spark Meta

50.6

Rank #46 Confirmed

Qwen3-4B Alibaba (Qwen)

31.9

Rank #264 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Muse Spark scores higher in 3 categories and Qwen3-4B in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Muse Spark leads 65.7 to 33.0.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 89.8% for Muse Spark and 52.3% for Qwen3-4B.
  • Qwen3-4B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Muse Spark and Qwen3-4B specifications
Muse SparkQwen3-4B
ProviderMetaAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index50.631.9
Released2026-04-082025-04-29
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked276

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Muse Spark: 46.2 (#69), Qwen3-4B: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkQwen3-4B
SciCode51.5%—
LMArena Coding1481—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Muse Spark: —, Qwen3-4B: 27.6 (#100)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkQwen3-4B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—35.7%

Reasoning Muse Spark leads

Muse Spark: 35.9 (#67), Qwen3-4B: 19.2 (#268)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkQwen3-4B
CritPt11.3%—
Chess Puzzles—4%
LMArena Hard Prompts1474—
Epoch Capabilities Index152.04—

Math Muse Spark leads

Muse Spark: 47.8 (#66), Qwen3-4B: 29.7 (#240)

Knowledge Muse Spark leads

Muse Spark: 65.7 (#13), Qwen3-4B: 33.0 (#208)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkQwen3-4B
GPQA Diamond89.8%52.3%
Humanity's Last Exam40.6%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate—5.7%
LMArena Expert1457—

Multimodal Not comparable

Muse Spark: 43.4 (#24), Qwen3-4B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkQwen3-4B
LMArena Vision1306—
LMArena Document1444—

Multilingual Not comparable

Muse Spark: 56.1 (#24), Qwen3-4B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkQwen3-4B
LMArena Non-English1464—
LMArena Chinese1509—
LMArena French1497—
LMArena German1497—
LMArena Korean1459—
LMArena Russian1466—
LMArena Spanish1472—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Muse Spark: 75.9 (#51), Qwen3-4B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkQwen3-4B
LMArena Instruction Following1442—

Long Context Not comparable

Muse Spark: 44.4 (#69), Qwen3-4B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkQwen3-4B
LMArena Longer Query1451—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Muse Spark: 66.0 (#39), Qwen3-4B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkQwen3-4B
LMArena Text1474—
LMArena Creative Writing1459—
LMArena Multi-Turn1477—

Frequently asked questions

Is Muse Spark better than Qwen3-4B?

Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.6 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Muse Spark and Qwen3-4B share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Spark has 27 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-4B has 6.

Related comparisons

Go deeper