Model comparison

Ministral 8B vs Qwen3.7 Flash

Qwen3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 28.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Ministral 8B Mistral AI

28.2

Rank #325 Confirmed

Qwen3.7 Flash Alibaba (Qwen)

39.9

Rank #156 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Ministral 8B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.7 Flash in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.7 Flash leads 48.9 to 12.6.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 27.1% for Ministral 8B and 82.3% for Qwen3.7 Flash.
  • Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper at $0.03 / $0.13 per million input/output tokens, against $0.15 / $0.15 for Ministral 8B.
  • Qwen3.7 Flash accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 262K.
  • Ministral 8B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Ministral 8B and Qwen3.7 Flash specifications
Ministral 8BQwen3.7 Flash
ProviderMistral AIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index28.239.9
Released2024-10-012026-07-15
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window262K1M
Max output262K131K
Input $ / M tokens$0.15$0.03
Output $ / M tokens$0.15$0.13
Results tracked177

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Ministral 8B: 35.0 (#230), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMinistral 8BQwen3.7 Flash
LMArena Coding1202—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Ministral 8B: 16.4 (#148), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMinistral 8BQwen3.7 Flash
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard11.1%—

Reasoning Qwen3.7 Flash leads

Ministral 8B: 18.4 (#281), Qwen3.7 Flash: 28.2 (#108)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMinistral 8BQwen3.7 Flash
NYT Connections (extended)—43.8%
Chess Puzzles—23%
LMArena Hard Prompts1191—
Mystery Game Puzzles—15%
DTBench45.7%—
Epoch Capabilities Index—144.64

Math Qwen3.7 Flash leads

Ministral 8B: 25.7 (#267), Qwen3.7 Flash: 38.3 (#140)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMinistral 8BQwen3.7 Flash
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—19.3%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—86.7%
LMArena Math1188—
MATH Level 514.9%—

Knowledge Qwen3.7 Flash leads

Ministral 8B: 12.6 (#297), Qwen3.7 Flash: 48.9 (#75)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMinistral 8BQwen3.7 Flash
GPQA Diamond27.1%82.3%
Vectara Hallucination Rate7.4%—
LMArena Expert1170—

Multilingual Not comparable

Ministral 8B: 35.1 (#247), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMinistral 8BQwen3.7 Flash
LMArena Non-English1165—
LMArena Chinese1193—
LMArena Russian1195—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Ministral 8B: 60.5 (#250), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMinistral 8BQwen3.7 Flash
LMArena Instruction Following1161—

Long Context Not comparable

Ministral 8B: 36.7 (#227), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMinistral 8BQwen3.7 Flash
LMArena Longer Query1212—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Ministral 8B: 39.6 (#246), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMinistral 8BQwen3.7 Flash
LMArena Text1191—
LMArena Creative Writing1175—
LMArena Multi-Turn1166—

Frequently asked questions

Is Ministral 8B better than Qwen3.7 Flash?

Qwen3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 28.2 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Ministral 8B or Qwen3.7 Flash?

Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.03 per million input tokens and $0.13 per million output tokens; Ministral 8B lists at $0.15 and $0.15.

Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.7 Flash does, with 1M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks do Ministral 8B and Qwen3.7 Flash share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Ministral 8B has 17 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Flash has 7.

Related comparisons

Go deeper