Noometry

Model comparison

Gemma 3 4B vs Qwen3.7 Flash

Qwen3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 28.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 3 4B Google

28.1

Rank #326 Confirmed

Qwen3.7 Flash Alibaba (Qwen)

39.9

Rank #156 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3 4B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.7 Flash in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.7 Flash leads 48.9 to 11.8.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 7.5% for Gemma 3 4B and 86.7% for Qwen3.7 Flash.
  • Gemma 3 4B is cheaper at $0.04 / $0.08 per million input/output tokens, against $0.03 / $0.13 for Qwen3.7 Flash.
  • Qwen3.7 Flash accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 131K.
  • Gemma 3 4B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemma 3 4BQwen3.7 Flash
ProviderGoogleAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index28.139.9
Released2025-03-122026-07-15
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window131K1M
Max output4K131K
Input $ / M tokens$0.04$0.03
Output $ / M tokens$0.08$0.13
Results tracked227

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Gemma 3 4B: 35.9 (#215), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

BenchmarkGemma 3 4BQwen3.7 Flash
LMArena Coding1230—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemma 3 4B: 20.9 (#142), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

BenchmarkGemma 3 4BQwen3.7 Flash
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard19.6%—

Reasoning Qwen3.7 Flash leads

Gemma 3 4B: 13.2 (#335), Qwen3.7 Flash: 28.2 (#108)

BenchmarkGemma 3 4BQwen3.7 Flash
Chess Puzzles0%23%
Epoch Capabilities Index116.02144.64
Kagi LLM Benchmark25.2%—
NYT Connections (extended)—43.8%
LMArena Hard Prompts1253—
Mystery Game Puzzles—15%
DTBench50.9%—
LMCA2.8%—

Math Qwen3.7 Flash leads

Gemma 3 4B: 16.8 (#292), Qwen3.7 Flash: 38.3 (#140)

BenchmarkGemma 3 4BQwen3.7 Flash
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20257.5%86.7%
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—19.3%
LMArena Math1239—

Knowledge Qwen3.7 Flash leads

Gemma 3 4B: 11.8 (#299), Qwen3.7 Flash: 48.9 (#75)

BenchmarkGemma 3 4BQwen3.7 Flash
GPQA Diamond23.2%82.3%
Vectara Hallucination Rate6.4%—
LMArena Expert1223—

Multilingual Not comparable

Gemma 3 4B: 42.5 (#194), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

BenchmarkGemma 3 4BQwen3.7 Flash
LMArena Non-English1273—
LMArena German1281—
LMArena Russian1294—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Gemma 3 4B: 65.2 (#225), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

BenchmarkGemma 3 4BQwen3.7 Flash
LMArena Instruction Following1239—

Long Context Not comparable

Gemma 3 4B: 38.7 (#194), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

BenchmarkGemma 3 4BQwen3.7 Flash
LMArena Longer Query1273—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Gemma 3 4B: 42.0 (#239), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

BenchmarkGemma 3 4BQwen3.7 Flash
LMArena Text1291—
LMArena Creative Writing1271—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1068—
LMArena Multi-Turn1255—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 3 4B better than Qwen3.7 Flash?

Qwen3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 28.1 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Gemma 3 4B or Qwen3.7 Flash?

Gemma 3 4B is cheaper. It lists at $0.04 per million input tokens and $0.08 per million output tokens; Qwen3.7 Flash lists at $0.03 and $0.13.

Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.7 Flash does, with 1M tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 4B and Qwen3.7 Flash share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 4B has 22 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Flash has 7.

Related comparisons

Go deeper