Model comparison

Llama 3-70B vs Qwen3.7 Flash

Qwen3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.

Llama 3-70B Meta

28.8

Rank #323 Confirmed

Qwen3.7 Flash Alibaba (Qwen)

39.9

Rank #156 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3-70B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.7 Flash in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.7 Flash leads 48.9 to 20.8.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 4.3% for Llama 3-70B and 86.7% for Qwen3.7 Flash.
  • Llama 3-70B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Llama 3-70B and Qwen3.7 Flash specifications
Llama 3-70BQwen3.7 Flash
ProviderMetaAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index28.839.9
Released2024-04-182026-07-15
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.03
Output $ / M tokens—$0.13
Results tracked317

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Llama 3-70B: 35.8 (#218), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BQwen3.7 Flash
BigCodeBench Instruct43.6%—
LMArena Coding1206—
BigCodeBench Complete54.5%—
HumanEval+72%—
MBPP+69%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Llama 3-70B: 21.1 (#139), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BQwen3.7 Flash
Cybench5%—

Reasoning Qwen3.7 Flash leads

Llama 3-70B: 18.0 (#288), Qwen3.7 Flash: 28.2 (#108)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BQwen3.7 Flash
Epoch Capabilities Index122.93144.64
Kagi LLM Benchmark35.1%—
NYT Connections (extended)—43.8%
Chess Puzzles—23%
LMArena Hard Prompts1195—
Mystery Game Puzzles—15%
DTBench54.2%—
ForecastBench57.1—
WinoGrande83.5%—

Math Qwen3.7 Flash leads

Llama 3-70B: 12.8 (#305), Qwen3.7 Flash: 38.3 (#140)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BQwen3.7 Flash
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20254.3%86.7%
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—19.3%
LMArena Math1218—
MATH Level 522.6%—

Knowledge Qwen3.7 Flash leads

Llama 3-70B: 20.8 (#277), Qwen3.7 Flash: 48.9 (#75)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BQwen3.7 Flash
GPQA Diamond40.6%82.3%
LMArena Expert1149—
MMLU79.3%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Llama 3-70B: 33.6 (#251), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BQwen3.7 Flash
LMArena Non-English1142—
LMArena Chinese1114—
LMArena French1232—
LMArena German1169—
LMArena Japanese1017—
LMArena Korean1017—
LMArena Russian1159—
LMArena Spanish1241—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Llama 3-70B: 62.5 (#238), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BQwen3.7 Flash
LMArena Instruction Following1194—

Long Context Not comparable

Llama 3-70B: 35.6 (#240), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BQwen3.7 Flash
LMArena Longer Query1174—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Llama 3-70B: 42.8 (#231), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BQwen3.7 Flash
LMArena Text1221—
LMArena Creative Writing1210—
LMArena Multi-Turn1223—

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama 3-70B better than Qwen3.7 Flash?

Qwen3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Llama 3-70B and Qwen3.7 Flash share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3-70B has 31 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Flash has 7.

Related comparisons

Go deeper