Model comparison

MiniMax-M2 vs Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B

MiniMax-M2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.9 to 32.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

MiniMax-M2 MiniMax

36.9

Rank #201 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. MiniMax-M2 scores higher in 7 categories and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where MiniMax-M2 leads 34.6 to 13.3.

Side by side

MiniMax-M2 and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B specifications
MiniMax-M2Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
ProviderMiniMaxAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index36.932.6
Released2025-10-272024-11-21
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window205K—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.30—
Output $ / M tokens$1.20—
Results tracked2114

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiniMax-M2 leads

MiniMax-M2: 39.1 (#151), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 35.4 (#211)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Coding13701236
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)61%—
LMArena WebDev1297—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

MiniMax-M2: 24.9 (#102), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
Terminal-Bench30%—
Vending-Bench 2160.6—

Reasoning Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B leads

MiniMax-M2: 18.6 (#256), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 22.9 (#172)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Hard Prompts13571220
Kagi LLM Benchmark57.8%—
NYT Connections (extended)14.8%—

Math MiniMax-M2 leads

MiniMax-M2: 34.6 (#158), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 13.3 (#297)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Math13501242
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—4.4%
MATH Level 5—42.7%

Knowledge MiniMax-M2 leads

MiniMax-M2: 36.3 (#160), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 25.1 (#257)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
GPQA Diamond—46.3%
LMArena Expert1336—

Multilingual MiniMax-M2 leads

MiniMax-M2: 45.6 (#165), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 40.1 (#217)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Non-English13141236
LMArena Chinese13671249
LMArena Russian13321246
LMArena French1336—
LMArena German1366—
LMArena Spanish1326—

Instruction Following MiniMax-M2 leads

MiniMax-M2: 70.4 (#160), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 65.0 (#222)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Instruction Following13291233

Long Context MiniMax-M2 leads

MiniMax-M2: 40.5 (#148), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 37.1 (#217)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Longer Query13321224

Writing & Preference MiniMax-M2 leads

MiniMax-M2: 53.3 (#157), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 45.8 (#218)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Text13401256
LMArena Creative Writing12881231
LMArena Multi-Turn13621252

Frequently asked questions

Is MiniMax-M2 better than Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B?

MiniMax-M2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.9 to 32.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is MiniMax-M2 or Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B better for coding?

MiniMax-M2 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.1 versus 35.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do MiniMax-M2 and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiniMax-M2 has 21 scored results on Noometry and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B has 14.

Related comparisons

Go deeper