Model comparison
MiniMax-M2.7 vs Wizardlm 13b
MiniMax-M2.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.4 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
MiniMax
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. MiniMax-M2.7 scores higher in 6 categories and Wizardlm 13b in 1 category; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiniMax-M2.7 leads 59.1 to 30.7.
Side by side
| MiniMax-M2.7 | Wizardlm 13b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | MiniMax | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 37.4 | 30.8 |
| Released | 2026-03-18 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 205K | — |
| Max output | 131K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.30 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $1.20 | — |
| Results tracked | 30 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiniMax-M2.7 leads
MiniMax-M2.7: 41.4 (#115), Wizardlm 13b: 29.6 (#293)
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.7 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1454 | 1035 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1397 | — |
| SciCode | 47% | — |
| WeirdML | 37% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 599.25 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
MiniMax-M2.7: 24.9 (#103), Wizardlm 13b: —
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.7 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 45.1% | — |
| ExploitBench | 13.3% | — |
| GBAEval | 0% | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
MiniMax-M2.7: 19.0 (#248), Wizardlm 13b: 18.5 (#265)
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.7 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1422 | 1018 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 24.7% | — |
| CritPt | 0.6% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 39.3% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 145.84 | — |
Math Wizardlm 13b leads
MiniMax-M2.7: 24.9 (#254), Wizardlm 13b: 27.8 (#235)
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.7 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1420 | 1017 |
| ProofBench | 3% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
MiniMax-M2.7: 37.1 (#151), Wizardlm 13b: —
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.7 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 12.9% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1443 | — |
Multilingual MiniMax-M2.7 leads
MiniMax-M2.7: 50.5 (#120), Wizardlm 13b: 27.3 (#272)
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.7 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1382 | 1034 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1439 | 1023 |
| LMArena French | 1422 | — |
| LMArena German | 1398 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1261 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1313 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1383 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1403 | — |
Instruction Following MiniMax-M2.7 leads
MiniMax-M2.7: 74.2 (#101), Wizardlm 13b: 53.7 (#280)
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.7 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1404 | 1049 |
Long Context MiniMax-M2.7 leads
MiniMax-M2.7: 43.3 (#94), Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#268)
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.7 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1419 | 1054 |
Writing & Preference MiniMax-M2.7 leads
MiniMax-M2.7: 59.1 (#107), Wizardlm 13b: 30.7 (#282)
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.7 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1404 | 1077 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1354 | 1090 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1413 | 1047 |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiniMax-M2.7 better than Wizardlm 13b?
MiniMax-M2.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.4 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is MiniMax-M2.7 or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?
MiniMax-M2.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.4 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do MiniMax-M2.7 and Wizardlm 13b share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiniMax-M2.7 has 30 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.