Noometry

Model comparison

Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct vs Wizardlm 13b

Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct Alibaba (Qwen)

38.1

Rank #190 Confirmed

Wizardlm 13b Microsoft

31.4

Rank #274 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct scores higher in 7 categories and Wizardlm 13b in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads 55.3 to 30.5.

Side by side

Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B InstructWizardlm 13b
ProviderAlibaba (Qwen)Microsoft
Noometry Index38.131.4
Released2025-04—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window262K—
Max output66K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.50—
Output $ / M tokens$7.50—
Results tracked2510

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads

Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 35.5 (#223), Wizardlm 13b: 30.1 (#298)

BenchmarkQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B InstructWizardlm 13b
LMArena Coding14121035
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)55.4%—
LMArena WebDev1275—
GSO4.9%—
WeirdML41.2%—
ALE-Bench461.45—
AlgoTune1.44—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 23.9 (#123), Wizardlm 13b: —

BenchmarkQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B InstructWizardlm 13b
Terminal-Bench27.2%—

Reasoning Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads

Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 25.5 (#149), Wizardlm 13b: 19.4 (#259)

BenchmarkQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B InstructWizardlm 13b
LMArena Hard Prompts13721018
Kagi LLM Benchmark49.5%—

Math Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads

Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 37.6 (#150), Wizardlm 13b: 30.2 (#238)

BenchmarkQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B InstructWizardlm 13b
LMArena Math13651017

Knowledge Not comparable

Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 37.0 (#162), Wizardlm 13b: —

BenchmarkQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B InstructWizardlm 13b
LMArena Expert1338—

Multilingual Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads

Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 47.7 (#148), Wizardlm 13b: 27.1 (#277)

BenchmarkQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B InstructWizardlm 13b
LMArena Non-English13461034
LMArena Chinese13571023
LMArena French1398—
LMArena German1325—
LMArena Japanese1310—
LMArena Korean1305—
LMArena Russian1366—
LMArena Spanish1360—

Instruction Following Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads

Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 71.6 (#147), Wizardlm 13b: 53.5 (#285)

BenchmarkQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B InstructWizardlm 13b
LMArena Instruction Following13551048

Long Context Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads

Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 42.0 (#131), Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#273)

BenchmarkQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B InstructWizardlm 13b
LMArena Longer Query13781054

Writing & Preference Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads

Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 55.3 (#147), Wizardlm 13b: 30.5 (#287)

BenchmarkQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B InstructWizardlm 13b
LMArena Text13571077
LMArena Creative Writing13331091
LMArena Multi-Turn13651047

Frequently asked questions

Is Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct better than Wizardlm 13b?

Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?

Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.5 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct and Wizardlm 13b share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct has 25 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.

Related comparisons

Go deeper