Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite vs Wizardlm 13b
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.8 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
Google
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite scores higher in 7 categories and Wizardlm 13b in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads 51.7 to 30.5.
- Wizardlm 13b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Wizardlm 13b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | |
| Noometry Index | 37.8 | 31.4 |
| Released | 2025-02-05 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 32 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 37.9 (#185), Wizardlm 13b: 30.1 (#298)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1322 | 1035 |
| LiveBench Coding | 47.1% | — |
Reasoning Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 22.0 (#210), Wizardlm 13b: 19.4 (#259)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1324 | 1018 |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 50.1% | — |
| DTBench | 52.5% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 65.5% | — |
| ForecastBench | 57.1 | — |
| LiveBench | 54.3% | — |
Math Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 34.1 (#196), Wizardlm 13b: 30.2 (#238)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1309 | 1017 |
| Omni-MATH | 37.4% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 58.1% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 35.0 (#189), Wizardlm 13b: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 72% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 50% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1305 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 31.2 (#109), Wizardlm 13b: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1100 | — |
Multilingual Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 46.0 (#161), Wizardlm 13b: 27.1 (#277)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1323 | 1034 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1339 | 1023 |
| LMArena French | 1347 | — |
| LMArena German | 1306 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1301 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1325 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1328 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1313 | — |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 70.4 (#163), Wizardlm 13b: 53.5 (#285)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1305 | 1048 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 78.3% | — |
| IFEval | 82.4% | — |
Long Context Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 40.1 (#160), Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#273)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1320 | 1054 |
Writing & Preference Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 51.7 (#177), Wizardlm 13b: 30.5 (#287)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1330 | 1077 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1319 | 1091 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1307 | 1047 |
| WildBench | 79% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 34.3% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite better than Wizardlm 13b?
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.8 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.9 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite and Wizardlm 13b share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite has 32 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.