Model comparison

MiniMax-M2.7 vs Solar Pro4

Solar Pro4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 37.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified October 11, 2026. 18 shared benchmarks.

MiniMax-M2.7

MiniMax

37.7

Rank #196 Confirmed

Solar Pro4

Upstage

42.1

Rank #121 Confirmed

Summary

They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. MiniMax-M2.7 scores higher in 5 categories and Solar Pro4 in 3 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
The widest gap is in math, where Solar Pro4 leads 38.8 to 25.9.
Both cost about the same: $0.30 input and $1.20 output per million tokens.
Solar Pro4 accepts more context: 524K tokens versus 205K.
MiniMax-M2.7 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

MiniMax-M2.7 and Solar Pro4 specifications
	MiniMax-M2.7	Solar Pro4
Provider	MiniMax	Upstage
Noometry Index	37.7	42.1
Released	2026-03-18	2026-08-06
Weights	Open	Proprietary
Context window	205K	524K
Max output	131K	131K
Input $ / M tokens	$0.30	$0.30
Output $ / M tokens	$1.20	$1.20
Results tracked	30	18

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiniMax-M2.7 leads

MiniMax-M2.7: 41.8 (#120), Solar Pro4: 40.1 (#149)

Coding benchmarks
Benchmark	MiniMax-M2.7	Solar Pro4
LMArena WebDev	1398	1371
LMArena Coding	1454	1437
SciCode	47%	—
WeirdML	37%	—
ALE-Bench	599.25	—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

MiniMax-M2.7: 25.1 (#111), Solar Pro4: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
Benchmark	MiniMax-M2.7	Solar Pro4
Terminal-Bench	45.1%	—
ExploitBench	13.3%	—
GBAEval	0%	—

Reasoning Solar Pro4 leads

MiniMax-M2.7: 19.7 (#253), Solar Pro4: 28.5 (#104)

Reasoning benchmarks
Benchmark	MiniMax-M2.7	Solar Pro4
LMArena Hard Prompts	1422	1399
NYT Connections (extended)	24.7%	—
CritPt	0.6%	—
Thematic Generalization	39.3%	—
Epoch Capabilities Index	145.85	—

Math Solar Pro4 leads

MiniMax-M2.7: 25.9 (#263), Solar Pro4: 38.8 (#128)

Math benchmarks
Benchmark	MiniMax-M2.7	Solar Pro4
LMArena Math	1420	1416
ProofBench	3%	—

Knowledge Solar Pro4 leads

MiniMax-M2.7: 37.7 (#152), Solar Pro4: 39.8 (#129)

Knowledge benchmarks
Benchmark	MiniMax-M2.7	Solar Pro4
LMArena Expert	1444	1427
Vectara Hallucination Rate	12.9%	—

Multilingual MiniMax-M2.7 leads

MiniMax-M2.7: 50.3 (#123), Solar Pro4: 48.7 (#139)

Multilingual benchmarks
Benchmark	MiniMax-M2.7	Solar Pro4
LMArena Non-English	1382	1361
LMArena Chinese	1441	1415
LMArena French	1421	1397
LMArena German	1398	1364
LMArena Japanese	1262	1309
LMArena Korean	1313	1382
LMArena Russian	1383	1360
LMArena Spanish	1403	1401

Instruction Following MiniMax-M2.7 leads

MiniMax-M2.7: 74.1 (#103), Solar Pro4: 72.7 (#132)

Instruction Following benchmarks
Benchmark	MiniMax-M2.7	Solar Pro4
LMArena Instruction Following	1405	1377

Long Context MiniMax-M2.7 leads

MiniMax-M2.7: 43.3 (#99), Solar Pro4: 42.1 (#130)

Long Context benchmarks
Benchmark	MiniMax-M2.7	Solar Pro4
LMArena Longer Query	1419	1381

Writing & Preference MiniMax-M2.7 leads

MiniMax-M2.7: 58.9 (#112), Solar Pro4: 56.5 (#138)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
Benchmark	MiniMax-M2.7	Solar Pro4
LMArena Text	1405	1386
LMArena Creative Writing	1354	1316
LMArena Multi-Turn	1412	1385

Frequently asked questions

Is MiniMax-M2.7 better than Solar Pro4?

Solar Pro4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 37.7 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, MiniMax-M2.7 or Solar Pro4?

Solar Pro4 is cheaper. It lists at $0.30 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens; MiniMax-M2.7 lists at $0.30 and $1.20.

Is MiniMax-M2.7 or Solar Pro4 better for coding?

MiniMax-M2.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.8 versus 40.1 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Solar Pro4 does, with 524K tokens against 205K.

How many benchmarks do MiniMax-M2.7 and Solar Pro4 share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiniMax-M2.7 has 30 scored results on Noometry and Solar Pro4 has 18.