Model comparison
Longcat Flash Chat vs MiniMax-M2.7
Longcat Flash Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 37.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.
MiniMaxSummary
- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Longcat Flash Chat scores higher in 7 categories and MiniMax-M2.7 in 1 category; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Longcat Flash Chat leads 39.4 to 25.9.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 17.7% for Longcat Flash Chat and 24.7% for MiniMax-M2.7.
Side by side
| Longcat Flash Chat | MiniMax-M2.7 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meituan | MiniMax |
| Noometry Index | 42.1 | 37.7 |
| Released | — | 2026-03-18 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 205K |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.30 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.20 |
| Results tracked | 19 | 30 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Longcat Flash Chat leads
Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#87), MiniMax-M2.7: 41.8 (#120)
| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1471 | 1454 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1398 |
| SciCode | — | 47% |
| WeirdML | — | 37% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 599.25 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Longcat Flash Chat: —, MiniMax-M2.7: 25.1 (#111)
| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 45.1% |
| ExploitBench | — | 13.3% |
| GBAEval | — | 0% |
Reasoning Too close to call
Longcat Flash Chat: 19.0 (#272), MiniMax-M2.7: 19.7 (#253)
| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 17.7% | 24.7% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1440 | 1422 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 43.9% | — |
| CritPt | — | 0.6% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 39.3% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 145.85 |
Math Longcat Flash Chat leads
Longcat Flash Chat: 39.4 (#107), MiniMax-M2.7: 25.9 (#263)
| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1442 | 1420 |
| ProofBench | — | 3% |
Knowledge Longcat Flash Chat leads
Longcat Flash Chat: 40.6 (#116), MiniMax-M2.7: 37.7 (#152)
| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1454 | 1444 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 12.9% |
Multilingual Longcat Flash Chat leads
Longcat Flash Chat: 51.9 (#101), MiniMax-M2.7: 50.3 (#123)
| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1404 | 1382 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1465 | 1441 |
| LMArena French | 1456 | 1421 |
| LMArena German | 1408 | 1398 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1373 | 1262 |
| LMArena Korean | 1371 | 1313 |
| LMArena Russian | 1395 | 1383 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1445 | 1403 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Longcat Flash Chat: 74.4 (#96), MiniMax-M2.7: 74.1 (#103)
| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1411 | 1405 |
Long Context Too close to call
Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#93), MiniMax-M2.7: 43.3 (#99)
| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1425 | 1419 |
Writing & Preference Longcat Flash Chat leads
Longcat Flash Chat: 61.0 (#91), MiniMax-M2.7: 58.9 (#112)
| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1427 | 1405 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1388 | 1354 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1418 | 1412 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Longcat Flash Chat better than MiniMax-M2.7?
Longcat Flash Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 37.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Longcat Flash Chat or MiniMax-M2.7 better for coding?
Longcat Flash Chat scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.5 versus 41.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Longcat Flash Chat and MiniMax-M2.7 share?
18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Longcat Flash Chat has 19 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M2.7 has 30.