Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite vs Solar Pro4
Solar Pro4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 37.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Google
UpstageSummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite scores higher in 0 categories and Solar Pro4 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Solar Pro4 leads 28.5 to 22.0.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Solar Pro4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Upstage | |
| Noometry Index | 37.8 | 42.1 |
| Released | 2025-02-05 | 2026-08-06 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 524K |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.30 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.20 |
| Results tracked | 32 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Solar Pro4 leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 37.9 (#185), Solar Pro4: 40.1 (#149)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1322 | 1437 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1371 |
| LiveBench Coding | 47.1% | — |
Reasoning Solar Pro4 leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 22.0 (#210), Solar Pro4: 28.5 (#104)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1324 | 1399 |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 50.1% | — |
| DTBench | 52.5% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 65.5% | — |
| ForecastBench | 57.1 | — |
| LiveBench | 54.3% | — |
Math Solar Pro4 leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 34.1 (#196), Solar Pro4: 38.8 (#128)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1309 | 1416 |
| Omni-MATH | 37.4% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 58.1% | — |
Knowledge Solar Pro4 leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 35.0 (#189), Solar Pro4: 39.8 (#129)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1305 | 1427 |
| MMLU-Pro | 72% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 50% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 31.2 (#109), Solar Pro4: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1100 | — |
Multilingual Solar Pro4 leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 46.0 (#161), Solar Pro4: 48.7 (#139)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1323 | 1361 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1339 | 1415 |
| LMArena French | 1347 | 1397 |
| LMArena German | 1306 | 1364 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1301 | 1309 |
| LMArena Korean | 1325 | 1382 |
| LMArena Russian | 1328 | 1360 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1313 | 1401 |
Instruction Following Solar Pro4 leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 70.4 (#163), Solar Pro4: 72.7 (#132)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1305 | 1377 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 78.3% | — |
| IFEval | 82.4% | — |
Long Context Solar Pro4 leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 40.1 (#160), Solar Pro4: 42.1 (#130)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1320 | 1381 |
Writing & Preference Solar Pro4 leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 51.7 (#177), Solar Pro4: 56.5 (#138)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1330 | 1386 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1319 | 1316 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1307 | 1385 |
| WildBench | 79% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 34.3% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite better than Solar Pro4?
Solar Pro4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 37.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite or Solar Pro4 better for coding?
Solar Pro4 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.1 versus 37.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite and Solar Pro4 share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite has 32 scored results on Noometry and Solar Pro4 has 18.